This is a collection of artworks which parodizes the characters from the videogame "A hat in time". This folder will be updated multiple times in the future, so don't be worried about the low number of artworks.
Feel free to share your considerations about them and if you want to see more stuff, you can find me on one of the following links:

Deviantart - http://lenbasisky.deviantart.com/

Newgrounds - http://lenbasisky.newgrounds.com/

PIXIV - https://www.pixiv.net/member.php?id=24239569

Tumblr - http://lenbasiskynest.tumblr.com/

Twitter - https://twitter.com/Lembanest

plot twist: its a dude

Base +3, HELLKINGX +6, RigenZ -6, GravityQueen +6

no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Base +6, HELLKINGX +6, RigenZ +6, zapzap7360 +6, el_vagio +5, nameress +6, ShoggothOfStone +6, metalgearkhan +6, asdasdasd22 +6, anon712 +6, mnbvcxz11 +6, somerandomdude33 +6, gaging0 +9, and 9 more...

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Base +2, metalgearkhan -6, Zarasth +7, somerandomdude33 -6, el_vagio -5, sex_ninja -6, TheCatman-Meow -6, Blood4TheBloodGod +6, memeboy333 -3, BooKuhBet -6

What the hell is that face she's making?

Base +6, jackels +8, somerandomdude33 +6, gaging0 +9, OnlyMyRail +6, TNBN +8, GravityQueen +6

"This is a collection of artworks", has one whole artworks and it's miserable.

At least you got to advertise all your different profiles in the uploader comment and that definitely wasn't the ulterior motive here! ha ha!

Base +6, somerandomdude33 +6, metalgearkhan +6, memeboy333 +3, Meredor -8, GravityQueen +6

@That would be interesting :).

@Which one? She's making different kind of expressions.

@lookabox I didn't know that advertise yourself was a such bad thing. You really opened my eyes. And i'm also pretty affascinated by your way to be constructive even without motivation and i appreciate your way to be kind and not deconstructive. And i like the fact that you noticed in the description that this collection will be updated in the future to compensate the low number of pics. A lot of people just prefer to be hateful nowdays, but at least you are an exception, am i not right?

Base +2, somerandomdude33 -6, TheCatman-Meow -6, Speedrun01 -1, metalgearkhan -6

Ok so ive seen plenty of your work and if i can offer some criticism i think you might need to work a bit on concepts and anatomy this is just my personal opinion of course but really your stuff needs to be more toned down and smooth i know there are many fetishes out there but i think your stuff is a bit too exaggerated to be fappable you might need to work on proportion a bit like tits are nice nd all but too much of a good thing turns sour quick just my 2 cents i honestly hope you get better at drawing the world could use more skilled artists

Base +4, starb11 -6, fireheart -6, somerandomdude33 +6, TheCatman-Meow +6, metalgearkhan +6

#lenbasisky Every face that's not in panel 3. It looks like the troll face meme. What emotion is she supposed to be giving off because I have no idea but it's thoroughly weird. I can't even make that face in real life!

Base +6, metalgearkhan +6, memeboy333 +3

@DarkDZ I don't deny the fact that i do errors about the anatomy of a character sometimes, but i don't undestand if you simply said that without being specific on what part of the body i didnt make well or if you said that in correlation to the fact that i draw exaggerated and surreal stuff. If it's the second one, which looks the most possible from what i read, anatomical aspects as very big boobs, even if it's not anatomically possible, is pretty legit if the pic doesn't want to be realistic but instead surrealistic. And something i like about such surrealism is the fact that the majority of the time you can break the sacred rules of the realistic anatomy. About instead your considerations about the fact that my stuff is unfappable and that can't be appreciate at 100% cause it's too exaggerated, well i understand but your opinion is very subjective. There is a ton of porn which is characterized by exaggerated fetishes, and as there are people who aren't very interested as u, there are others who instead can be interested by it. And considering that these are pretty fun to draw, i will keep to put them in my works. Obviously not always because i like the variations, but i'm pretty sure that there will be almost always in the future.
However, thx for the comment.

@Mrmanandu Mmmh i don't deny that the expressions of the character might remind that one of the troll face, but they aren't supposed to replicate such thing. As i usually do, i like to draw on the characters some pretty cartoonish expression, especially with a kind of cartoonish mouths like that ones you saw on the pics. And i think that's pretty clear that it's impossible to replicate such expression in real life considering that it's supposed to be a cartoonish expression and so surrealistic.

Base +2, somerandomdude33 -6, TheCatman-Meow -6, metalgearkhan -6, ponglenis2 -6, Meredor +8, TNBN -8, samm1e1 +10

These comments are, by design, for commenting on the content of the gallery. However, if you want specifically designed critique just for you, I'll be happy to provide.

The text boxes are lazy and you need someone to proofread. First two pages have inhuman faces that convey no real understandable expression. The abdominal section of her body in unparsable - is it supposed to be a paunch? In combination with the rest of the body, without the hair it looks incredibly mannish despite there being no male tags in the gallery. Why is she doing a Jojo's pose? Did you DRAW a letter in on page 3's text instead of just pressing ctrl+z and re-typing the text? Page 4's text being being broken up (Cri- minal) is a result of the lazy text boxes. The wrists of both arms are slender but the sleeved parts are drawn muscle-bound as fuck. The arms appear asymmetrical. Why are the pupils spiraled in the first two pages?

That's just the stuff that isn't nitpicking. That's why it's miserable. People comment about this stuff like I am on all your links, they say it in your prior galleries, they send it directly to you, but you don't do anything. You never improve. Why should anyone spend their time like I just did when you're clearly just going to ignore it or make excuses as to why it's justified with the last couple people in this very same gallery? You just don't accept critique, so don't fucking ask for it.

Base +6, metalgearkhan +6, memeboy333 +3

@lookabox Very interesting, i didn't expect something so elaborated from you. At least, i'm pretty sure to talk with somebody who has some good considerations to share this time. Something that you made me doubt with your first post, to be sincere.
But before to talk about them, i need to share some considerations as well about your concept of criticism.

1) Surely, we agree both about the fact that anyone has the right to post a critique on the artwork/s of any kind of content creator, but this doesn't mean that the content creators in question doesn't have the right as well to analize such critiques. And as you can guess, not always a critique can be well elaborated and if the content creator notices some parts of it that aren't explained well or in a wrong way, it's his right to critique that parts. Let's take as examples the critiques of DarkDZ and MrManandu. Any of them is different and any of them has some parts that can be questionable.
In the case of MrManandu, i agree about the fact that a few expressions can be pretty weird, but at the same time it isn't completly correct to value them from a realistic point of view. I can understand if my style was trying to imitate a realistic or semi-realistic expression, but considering that it's more inclined to an anime/manga style and this one can be characterized by forms of expressions that can't be imitated completly in real life, i considered such consideration not enough logical. Sure, even if the expressions are cartoonish, they're based on the realistic ones, but the problem of these expressions is not related to the fact that aren't realistic, but that i didn't draw them pretty well. He just made the error to try to critique them, using a last consideration which not only wasn't necessary (cause he already made me notice that i didn't draw them pretty well) but it was a wrong way to value them.
In the case of DarkDZ, he explained his critique in a good way, but his consideration about the fact that i shouldn't draw exaggerated stuff to make my pics fappable or enjoyable in general isn't a good consideration. If he has said that he didn't like them because he prefers different fetishes, there won't be problems for me. Anyone has different preferences and i'm not a such dickhead to dictate what it's good and what it's bad, but saying that i had to avoid to draw some specific stuff to become better is an other thing. As i said, anyone has different preferences and i valued his critique explaining that his consideration was just pretty subjective. Just that.
Maybe i did the error to value such critiques only on such little details, but even if i did, i swear that i didn't have the intention to destroy such critiques. I wanted to clarify that, if it's the impression i gave to you while you were reading them. And ask sorry to you and to the critics if i were too rough unnecessarily, if it's the case.

2) Talking about your first critique, instead, this one is a case a bit different. You said that i'm not able to accept criticism, but how can i accept criticism if it comes from a “critique” which doesn't explain your reasons behind your considerations and that don't help me to understand what i did wrong about my pics? At least, the critiques of DarkDZ and MrManandu were motivated and they helped me to understand what i did wrong or what didn't appeal their tastes, but from your critique i didn't understand anything because it was too general. The only thing i was able to understand was your consideration about the fact that i shouldn't advertise my other socials how it was something bad to do. That's an opinion that i don't share with you, because any artist has the right to tell to any viewer who likes his stuff where to find his main blogs where he puts more stuff. A lot of artists do that and there is nothing bad about it. And if you write a such poor critique, don't pretend that the content creator considers such critique a good one. It's like to pretend that a rough sketch get valued in the same way of a completed illustration (shaded and colored). Something that also i don't understand it's the hateful tone you used in such critique, which is something completly unneccesary. Infact, seeing a post very general, not motivated and with such tone, at the beginning i thought that you were just a troll who was trying to be a dickhead building a poor critique. I met a few of them who made something like this and any time i tried to respond them seriously, they didn't have the courage to respond or they responded in a rude or stupid way. This explains why i used the sarcasm to respond you. I like to mix it with a critique when i speak with persons like this sometimes. But considering your case, i think that i will need to be more careful when i want to respond to someone. Just to avoid unnecessary problems for any discussion i will get into next time. Personally, i still don't like that rough way you used to explain your considerations, because i think that the best critiques don't have to be so aggressive and hateful to be effective (i know that even reproaches can be useful, but i'm not into that kind of thinking current), but i ask you sorry for the sarcasm i used in my first response. I don't regret anything of what i said there, but i understand that the sarcasm was unnecessary.

3) Let's talk about your second critique now. The first part of the critique was pretty interesting to read, because it's completly the opposite of the first one you wrote. Infact, not only it is motivated and very specific as i would expect from a good critique, but it's also pretty elaborated. And the considerations about the technic aspects of my pics are reasonable. This means that i agree on what you explained and i understand that i didn't do only a few errors in that pics. First of all, the anatomy. I don't usually pay enough attention on it sometimes. Unfortunately, when i start to draw i have the tendency to try to draw the character/s and the bg fastly to don't waste too much time and my little patience can produce results like these. Responding instead to the minor questions you asked me:
- The pose of the character isn't supposed to be a Jojo's pose. I have never seen one of these pose from that anime, so if it's a bit similar to one of these poses it's just a casuality. I didn't have any intention to imitate these ones.
- On the abdominal part, there is the paunch. To be specific a paunch which is a little chubby and looking that now i understand that i could make it better. And you're right. Drawing the superior part of ther body a bit muscolar ruined her a bit (especially in the first two versions. Same for the arms.
- That pupils are typical characteristics of my style.
At last, there are the text-box and i agree about the fact that in part their ugliness was caused by my lazyness and by my little patience, while the other part was caused by my little attention in post-creation. This a problem that i started to notice while i was drawing the most recent pics and i'm trying to be more careful and improve such aspect. This problem affected also what i wrote and that was even an other bad move, considering that the English language isn't my first one. And i tried also to make a different text-box in these recent pics because that ones i used until now started to be too much banal to my eyes. So yeah, you're right about the fact that i was lazy. Lazyness is a ugly beast that can catch anybody. You included, because if you were able to write an elaborated critique like this one, this means that you didn't have the same will when you wrote the first critique. We are humans after all.
At last, i want to discuss about the only thing on which i have to say something, that is the part where you that i never improve and i'm not able to accept criticism.
About the first, let me say that it isn't completly true. Since i started to post stuff on internet i changed many features on my style to improve it as: have better attention and cure of the shading and of the lineworks; adding light on the body of the characters to make the characters and drawing itself better to see; trying to experiment different expressions and characteristics related to this one as the smaller pupils for the aeghao faces (but i have to admit that sometimes i keep doing the same error when i draw normal faces).
About the anatomy, i don't say to disagree, but not all what i draw it's terrible on that part. I don't guarantee that i will improve myself in a short time about that aspect, cause the anatomy require a lot of practise, attention and time to be mastered properly. And i will keep ask critiques as yours, because it's thanks to this ones that i was able to improve myself even with little steps to make my art better. And btw, just because someone told me time ago to correct a specific aspect that i didnt' correct even now, doesn't mean that i don't care about the considerations of the critiques, but simply the time which is passed wasn't necessary to help me to understand to remedy at that error in all the pics i drew. And any case, even if i wasn't able to improve a specific aspect of my style i was able to improve others in meanwhile. And as these one, i will improve also this aspect which gives me problems one day.
And i always hope to get helpful critiques like yours to improve myself. Feel free to think whatever you want about my words. With all these considerations i wanted to sincere and right as i should be as an artist, but the last words always are yours if you want express yourself about them. In any case, thx for the reading and for your patience. Have a nice day.

Base +2, mnbvcxz11 -6, somerandomdude33 -6, el_vagio -5, TheCatman-Meow -6, metalgearkhan -6, ponglenis2 -6, megamanzerobasslink +4, BooKuhBet -6, TNBN -8, Dagoth Gares -6, samm1e1 +10, lgdz -9

wait a minute how the fuck are you getting multiple comments
when i try to comment multiple times it just edits my original post

Base +6, somerandomdude33 +6, speedingAndroid +8

what the fuck is this mountain of text
what the fuck is this gallery

Base +6, somerandomdude33 +6, el_vagio +5, ponglenis2 +6, Speedrun01 -1, metalgearkhan +6, ShadowDepths +6, memeboy333 +3, danielwain +5, TNBN +8, ApatheticWrath +5, speedingAndroid +8, nwahnamednerevar +6, and 1 more...

tl'dr arts shit

Base +3, metalgearkhan +6, MDetector5 -6, Meredor -8, speedingAndroid +8

what expression is that bitch supposed to be making? why is it that the creator can't perform simple grammar checks? how do you not improve after so much critique? will these questions ever be answered? find out next time when lenbasisky posts a gallery of the same shit proportions, horrid grammar, and terrible, terrible text boxes.

Base +2, metalgearkhan +6, MDetector5 -6, memeboy333 +3, Meredor -8, nwahnamednerevar +6, Beans7897 +2

stick to the source material and go off that bud.

Base +4, Dagoth Gares +6, ApatheticWrath +5