[James Howard] Vore Story Ch. 3: Punishment [Ongoing]

Posted on 16 June 2018, 18:08 by: Maximum_Joe

Uploader Comment

Ch. 1: https://e-hentai.org/g/1115218/6506fb9c32/
Ch. 2: https://e-hentai.org/g/1170022/7e05caa94d/

Posted on 19 April 2018, 18:05 by: sukretep

Soon it's gonna need "all the way through" tag, ain't it?

Posted on 19 April 2018, 19:45 by: Crociere

im not into gay shit but fuck. what can i do other than to fap?

Posted on 19 April 2018, 19:50 by: laboblox

fap harder

Posted on 19 April 2018, 23:37 by: Brian.Vini

Balls don't touch, it's not gay yet. Feel safe to fap, but take your hands of your dick before looking at a new page

Posted on 21 April 2018, 06:55 by: Bookrat15

It's not gay.. Thats a lady and a boy

Posted on 21 April 2018, 16:26 by: kronda

id wish james cat sona fuck and satan cat was the only ones getting pain honestly

Posted on 23 April 2018, 23:13 by: Monkey D. Law

That moment when you've read so many Howard stories that you almost start to enjoy his type of vore.... What have you done to me

Posted on 23 April 2018, 23:26 by: AnswerIsAlwayMiata

A month of e-hentai and you'll be able to fap at anything.

Posted on 24 April 2018, 02:16 by: harawanagangsta

Atwt Anal Tongue penetration is nice. But have you heard the word of the Lord?

Posted on 24 April 2018, 15:39 by: Caesar Czarson

Thats not how anatomy works

Posted on 25 April 2018, 17:26 by: Crociere

bothers me that the she dosnt have a vagina. So this is actually pure yaoi. male x trannie.
i wan't to fap to this, I'm so close. But Trannie voices hunts me in my head.

Posted on 26 April 2018, 16:52 by: imercenary

The doctor/narrator is the best part of the whole thing.

Posted on 30 April 2018, 10:35 by: lesbomancey

shit just got 10 times better

Posted on 03 May 2018, 04:28 by: CaptainFalcon333

Oh man, always giving more. You got this, James.

Posted on 03 May 2018, 08:54 by: Michael P

Page 20 "dude, you better tell her how beautiful she is when she is angry, and FAST!" lol

Posted on 04 May 2018, 05:37 by: randomletterjumble

This is about to give new meaning to the term spitroast, isn't it.

Posted on 06 May 2018, 19:51 by: Salaminder

I was honestly just about to look for this guy again, and here he is on frontpage

Posted on 07 May 2018, 02:01 by: randomletterjumble

Wait, so instead of impaling him all the way through so the head of her penis is through his mouth, she's concerned about his safety and discussing her feelings?

Who is this and what did they do to the real James Howard?

Posted on 07 May 2018, 02:34 by: Argonisgema

A futa that doesn't wanna do it?

ok now i'm interested in this story.

Posted on 07 May 2018, 08:22 by: jimbo21

@randomletterjumble
I know right? I usually hate James's stuff but this is actually interesting despite being a total fetish turn off for me.

Posted on 08 May 2018, 22:28 by: Reala689

That kiss made it all worth it.

Posted on 09 May 2018, 09:28 by: wcthesecret

...so is this guy gay then? Because the tag says shemale...so is he gay then?

Posted on 09 May 2018, 13:43 by: james_howard

@wcthesecret

Only traps are gay. Trannys are A-ok, my boy.

Posted on 11 May 2018, 08:56 by: wcthesecret

@james_howard

...but that’s wrong...that’s so very very wrong. Physically and logically.

Posted on 11 May 2018, 14:20 by: james_howard

@wcthesecret

Jokes aside, shemales aren't a "gay" thing, because they resemble women. I mean, if you're interested in a shemale you're looking for a woman with "something extra", not a guy. It's not the straightest thing in the word(because of the dick and all), but I don't think if falls under the gay category. And I'd say the same goes for traps.

But that's, like, my opinion.

Posted on 12 May 2018, 01:48 by: justdoitmarshall

Tina's really pretty but what the fuck is she? Demon horse? Horse-shark-dragon?

Posted on 14 May 2018, 17:06 by: AnswerIsAlwayMiata

"Nigga you got issues" So we do all

Posted on 16 May 2018, 02:20 by: wcthesecret

@james_howard

I think you’re thinking of futas. Futas are pure females that have dicks. Shemales are trannies. As in they were originally men that decided to become liars and trick people into thinking that they are actually women. Which they aren’t. And they never will be women.

Posted on 16 May 2018, 12:59 by: james_howard

@wcthesecret

Yeah, but still that doesn't change the fact that someone looking to get with a shemale is not looking for a "man" in the sense that they're not looking for a masculine figure, but the other way around.

Posted on 17 May 2018, 03:06 by: wcthesecret

@james_howard

That still makes them gay though, therefore this is Yaoi.

Posted on 17 May 2018, 17:49 by: nicrocon

If I learned anything from the last James howard comics it's that he will be perfectly. Large Insertion is perfectly safe, only vore can kill in this universe.

Posted on 17 May 2018, 19:00 by: PregnantWhoreFucker

TFW no giant waifu to prepare your anus for.

Posted on 18 May 2018, 00:04 by: AUsuario2

Pagina 27: "Oye Parker, estás demente."

Posted on 21 May 2018, 04:31 by: NARCE

I find terms like futa and shemale to be a bother, but it's at least nice to see that transphobes are cuntpunched.

Liking the comic, by the way. :U

Posted on 21 May 2018, 04:44 by: JinzoCrush

Some of these comics forget that things with skeletons have a pelvic cradle.

Posted on 21 May 2018, 13:05 by: Darlumina

And of course he cums, a penis that size probably squashed his prostate flat a sheet of paper not to mention rearranging of his innards.

Posted on 22 May 2018, 01:11 by: Xionos

What is it with people these days that forget the term bisexual is a thing?

Posted on 27 May 2018, 04:37 by: Michael P

@james_howard
I dunno.. she kinda has some rather masculine features.
Maybe he's bisexual? I know straight guys who like getting stuffed with strapons.. not a lot different here.. only she can fill him up at some point lol

Posted on 27 May 2018, 08:58 by: Sedlina

futanari: japanese for hermaphrodite
hermaphrodite = a being with complete reproductive organs (womb + ovaries, balls + prostate) and the sex organs of both genders => a dick, balls and a vagina

slapping tits on a guy doesn't turn him into a woman. This is - like most of his/her work just yaoi (aka male on male) content.

E-H-G does mix the futa tag with these traps. But that doesn't change the global definition

futanari/herm/hermaphrodite: dick balls vagina
trap: female features and/or boobs, but a guy (no vagina)
femboy: female features and petite, but a guy (no vagina)
dick-girl: a gal (vagina) with a dick either as clit or above a clit but without balls

You are welcome. Knowing the toxic community the downvotes will be massive again... Apparently no one wants some education mixed into their kinky time.

Even less so when they realize that they have homosexual tendencies and that they try to hide them - or lie to themselves by slapping tits on one of the two guys.

Posted on 27 May 2018, 15:10 by: james_howard

@Michael P

Well, I didn't claim he'd be straight. If he likes both masculine and feminine features, he's definitely in between gay and straight, so bi would be the best term to describe.

Posted on 28 May 2018, 14:02 by: DDSH02549

That story is taking a cute road, I like it more and more

Posted on 28 May 2018, 19:50 by: dekir

Okay when is going to appear the vore god again? things can go this well in this kind of comics for long so shut us on the face already sir

Posted on 30 May 2018, 08:27 by: Tungsten Seraph

An armadillo-bat guy is being impaled and anally enveloped by some manner of breast-equipped musclebeast two stories in height, able to send a two inch tongue through a man, and swallow entire watermelons whole, and the first issue people bring up here is, "is it homosexual".

God I love you people.

I must say, though, I agree with James here. From a scientific perspective, transgender people have the brain chemistry and functionality of the gender they desire to be. Meanwhile, homosexuals have the brain setup of the gender they *are*. Thus, to fuck a tranny is on some level physiologically discernable from fucking a gay. In fact if the transgender personage in this scenario had his way, the difference would be that you are fucking in one case a man and another a woman (hells of sicknasty wordplay up ins).

Now, the real question is, do *you*, dear reader, consider the brain of a person to be that personage in its majority, or do you consider their persona as the entire physical form of the person? And if it is the latter, what would you say that brain is worth when it disagrees with its abode?

Indeed, 'tis merely left to the individual to decide the answer, since the definitions aren't helping anyone.

Posted on 10 June 2018, 06:26 by: jimbo21

@Sedlina
Aren't traps are just boys that appear feminine (wider hips, more narrow shoulders), if they have boobs then they aren't a trap afaik.
And femboys are just the same as traps you just know they're not females?
Back in my day a trap was just a boy you thought was a girl, not some intersex shit.

Also drop the preemptive whining about the "toxic community" downvoting you. It makes you seem pompous and whiny and that makes me want to downvote you.

Posted on 19 June 2018, 18:33 by: 8bitdahpandah

"oh, boy, here it comes" lol

Posted on 20 June 2018, 08:05 by: Pepsi10

Heh. that was actually very cute so far.

Posted on 20 June 2018, 08:38 by: Michael P

Maybe she should at least let him crawl back up in her ass.. at least.

@Tungsten Seraph
Some people don't consider the brain to be what makes you male or female..
From what I gather... republicans and conservatives go by bioligy... in that chromosomes are in charge of male or female.
personally i don't agree...
But the folks showing up here are clearly rather closed minded... and consider it gay just cause they both got dicks..

Posted on 21 June 2018, 08:05 by: MaginAeos

@Michael P

Just because you are offended doesn't make you right or correct in your opinion.

Posted on 22 June 2018, 01:03 by: 4chatwrath

Everybody, quick! To the shelter!

Posted on 22 June 2018, 12:53 by: renardok

@Michael P

This is a drawn comic involving an anthropomorphic bat getting a cock the size of his entire body shoved inside of him and not dying from it and you're butthurt about gender and probably upset because you know it's gay but don't want to admit it.

Posted on 25 June 2018, 15:25 by: nwahnamednerevar

wait uh, why the fuck are we saying that girl's a transgirl? has the author stated so, or are we just guessing that a porn comic has a transgirl instead of, well, a fuckin futa?

Posted on 25 June 2018, 20:12 by: MagicalJuko

Isn't this what we call being sexually manipulative?

Posted on 25 June 2018, 23:31 by: randomletterjumble

Yes. Yes, that is what he wants.

Posted on 26 June 2018, 10:56 by: Pepsi10

What even are these things? Demons?

Posted on 26 June 2018, 19:39 by: Michael P

Maybe he can just climb in your ass and be your dildo again?

Posted on 26 June 2018, 21:30 by: Billaxle

Oh please, it's not like Vore is the weirdest fetish in the world. This Is! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMzYJzP3xww

Posted on 27 June 2018, 20:53 by: lesbomancey

he ded as fuck

Posted on 27 June 2018, 22:05 by: makesnosence

Therapist makes this series so much better! :D
Also, kinda pointless to argue if it's "gay shit" or not. I mean, as long as you're enjoying it, does it really matter?
(Unless you're fapping on it... because then you're sick fuck and should ask for help xD)

Posted on 28 June 2018, 01:22 by: nicrocon

somehow james has tricked me into wanting this guy to die

Posted on 28 June 2018, 02:06 by: Michael P

If she eats him, i'm done.. that's just too much for me...

Posted on 29 June 2018, 04:11 by: james_howard

@Michael P

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/024/703/weakness.jpg

Posted on 01 July 2018, 08:48 by: jimbo21

@michael p
This is all a flashback isn't it? It's not like he can die in a flashback he's having.

@nicrocon
I don't but i can see how you'd turn on him. He just got super annoying.

Posted on 01 July 2018, 20:13 by: johnnychcr

They are going to fusion...right?

Posted on 01 July 2018, 21:25 by: Ezio45

bitch I understand wanting to eb eaten but you pass up going in her ass again man do that than bug her to eat yea. owo

Posted on 04 July 2018, 12:53 by: Savant-ISM

So based on the fact that he comes back to therapy to tell the story. We can assume he survived the eating part. But the main question is, from which hole did he come out? Is James Howard Deviant enough to do an "all the way through" twice in the same comic? But this time in reverse? I can't say I won't be surprised.

Last edited on 22 September 2018, 09:12.

Posted on 05 July 2018, 00:03 by: Michael P

Yeah.... no..
I prefer the anal stuff over this.
it's one thing to be a living dildo, and another to be eaten.

Posted on 09 July 2018, 16:27 by: Bhaal29

Its one thing get eaten, its another to be digested.

I mean including the scalding stomach acid, the lack of oxygen, and the chocking muscle spasm there's no a lot of "sexual" stuff there.

Unless you got a fetish for long, painful snuff....

Posted on 15 July 2018, 02:10 by: MagicalJuko

Also, he's not the best shape to swallow or insert... Lots of pointy bits that can get caught.

Posted on 16 July 2018, 07:45 by: Winco

有些重口

Posted on 17 July 2018, 00:39 by: DarkShadow6

fuck you fuck you fuck you
the fact that I don't hate this concerns me
i swear to raptor jesus if you get me into vore of all things I will come to your fucking house and smash every watermelon you inevitably own
james fucking HOWARD

Posted on 17 July 2018, 05:04 by: james_howard

@DarkShadow6

Welcome to the family, son.

Posted on 18 July 2018, 07:29 by: bombertroy

If you think the first ending will result in death -
If you think it'll be a plain ole happy ending +
Taking all bets.

Posted on 20 July 2018, 17:07 by: Xionos

Michael P

Back in my day we just called people like you in the closet....

Doesn't matter what ya feel. Everyone's anon here. No harm admitting ya got bisexual tendencies for guys with feminine forms.

A dick is a dick a vag is a vag

If ya like dick and only dick and ya got a dick you're gay nothing wrong with that.
If ya like vag and only vag and ya got a vag you're gay too.
If ya got either a vag or a dick and only like the opposite. you're straight.
If a hole is a hole and you like both you're bisexual. Simple as that.

No need for 6 billion descriptions that all mean the same damn thing.

Posted on 28 July 2018, 09:20 by: Dudeydudey911

Jerk away Tina, I think everyone here can't believe they're going to cum from this either, but well, here we are.

Posted on 28 July 2018, 10:32 by: NARCE

The sentiment of "back in the day" always felt a little weird to me. Like, sure, back in the day it was that way. Just like how back in the day smoking was apparently a really healthy thing to do. It doesn't really matter what things were like back in the day if those notions are considered outdated today, which they are - at least by younger generations. Human understanding march forward, as it were.

Posted on 30 July 2018, 12:39 by: Xionos

@Narce...

You're really comparing smoking to bullshit from tumblr which all mean the same damn thing?...

God damn tri gender pyro foxes......

Posted on 30 July 2018, 14:48 by: NARCE

@Xionos I am merely making the point that we have plenty of outdated notions of what is right and wrong (either morally or factually), and by itself, "back in my day" is not a valid argument. That things were different is not enough - you have to be able to demonstrate that the changes are without justification.

Posted on 02 August 2018, 09:56 by: jimbo21

@narce
Or you can prove the change is justified.
Using your own example: finding out that smoking is bad.

Posted on 02 August 2018, 15:17 by: NARCE

@jimbo21 I agree with you. Thankfully, there is growing evidence on it, and there exists a consensus within the psychological community on trans people. That said, even without evidence, the point still stands that "back in my day" isn't a good argument on its own. Of course, with the evidence on hand, it's especially not a good argument, and you need more substance, particularly substance that would serve to discredit the evidence and consensus.

*fap*

Posted on 04 August 2018, 19:14 by: Tonythekat

Mother of mercy, is this the end of Amon? Seriously though, from the looks of the latest page he's doomed to being digested. And I was hoping for a more upbeat ending than that horror show James did about the mage and the two thieves. But, Tony, you're going to argue; he's narrating the story to the psychiatrist so he must be alive. Not if JH pulls the old 'ghost talking to the living' bit at the end and it turns out he's been dead all along. I hope this isn't the case but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Posted on 05 August 2018, 01:49 by: nuggistrike

som on needs a milk bath sins milk cancle acid !

Posted on 05 August 2018, 09:31 by: jimbo21

@narce I'm not even part of that argument. I just don't agree with you saying that "back in my day" is a bad argument as if it nullifies the point without providing counter evidence.
My point is that ideas and concepts were understood and accepted in the past for a reason and it's up to the people that wish to change these to show why. Also appealing to authority isn't always good because you get people like a particular "science guy" or other idealogues in the field.

@tonythekat you do realize this is being told in a flashback, right?

Posted on 05 August 2018, 14:58 by: NARCE

@jimbo21 I said that "back in my day" is a bad argument by itself. No attempt is being made to argue against the evidence or scientific consensus, just saying "all these new-fangled terminologies, why back in my day..."

As far as appealing to authority, appeals to authority are a huge part of both sides of this conversation. The people who made the determination of what gender even means are authority figures. Religious leaders who are a big influencer on how people define gender are authority figures. Hell, before the American Psychiatric Association changed its consensus in accordance with the evidence provided, the authority figures there were considered a valid source. Indeed, I can also cite the fact that the American Psychiatric Association received a major letter-writing campaign to label being transgender as a mental illness.

And going further, how am I to cite evidence of something to do with how a person's brain works, how their psyche works, if I am not also "appealing to authority"? I mean, if I'm not appealing to authority in doing that, then I can't exactly provide evidence, because the people who profess to be experts on this subject are the people producing this evidence.

Also, Bill Nye the Science Guy actually provided information that is in line with the scientific consensus. What he says is not controversial among the experts on the subject, only among people who are not. You can disagree with him, that is certainly your right, but at no point should we pretend that the disagreement is done because of the evidence provided rather than your own personal ideology. Wouldn't you concur?

Posted on 05 August 2018, 16:43 by: james_howard

@jimbo21
@NARCE
@Xionos

Back in my day, there weren't so many faggots discussing stupid bullshit on fucking porn sites.

Posted on 05 August 2018, 21:46 by: justdoitmarshall

@James_Howard

Amen lol

Posted on 06 August 2018, 00:58 by: NARCE

@james_howard Get to making the comic quicker so I can spend more time fapping then.

Posted on 08 August 2018, 02:22 by: alohrohro

@NARCE
Xionos presented a simple system of identifying sexual orientation based on genitalia. "back in my day" isn't the important part of his argument.

In regards to authority, it may be true that religious leaders don't generally argue from a scientific method, however medical institutions have been politicized in this field for a while. A few decades back Gay movement protests triggered a political change in the American Psychological Association and took off homosexuality from the mental illness list for political and not scientific reasons. Furthermore, replication (to test) of psychological experiments are rarely done and ~2/3rd of the experiments fail replication. The current method of determining mental illness is very subjective: cause extreme harm in everyday life. Even the conclusions from the data can be interpreted in different ways. Because of this and more, the authority in the psychology field is shaky. Heck, Bill Nye only has a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering. He has six phds but those are all honorary. Furthermore, he has other people screen his material before a show. When people dispute authority, they create their own hypotheses/perspectives to make sense of something.

In regards to Xionos's argument, if we use what animal scientists use to objectively classify sexual orientation, then the only thing that determines sexual orientation are reproductive system matchups. They don't care whether an animal thinks it's female, acts like a female, or looks like female. They only care about whether it biologically reproduces (how it imparts genetic information) as a female or male when determining sexual orientation. Ultimately, everything from chromosomes, gender identity, gender roles, gender characteristics (e.g. feminine/masculine/boobs/curvy), sexual orientation, etc. objectively comes down to whether an organism reproduces as a male or female biologically. Any feminine characteristic such as boobs or a strap-on vagina on a reproductive male is pseudoheteroseuxal when matched up with another reproductive male for example. These characteristics including biological ones like chromosomes are ultimately derived from biological reproductive sex. This is why the only objective way of determing sexual orientation is looking at whether the sexual matchups are between the same reproductive systems. This classification works for the sterile, asexual reproductive organisms, futanari, and intersex( but I'll cut that short for brevity. The "back in my day" perspective is generally an objective approach to whether something is straight or gay based on biological reproduction matchups as opposed to the convluluted subjective approach that's based on every little individual gender characteristics, traits, perspective, attraction, etc. In the end, Xionos's perspective is basically a simplified objective version of all of this perspective: penis person+vagina person is straight, penis person+penis person is gay. And yes I fap to everything with unholy abandon.

Posted on 08 August 2018, 17:48 by: bombertroy

Looking forward to the bad ending.

Posted on 08 August 2018, 17:51 by: NARCE

@NARCE Firstly, the argument that gay rights activists politicized psychology is disingenuous, because homosexuality and transgender were added to the DSM following a campaign by religious fundamentalists, and not because people in the psychological (or even biological) community felt that it was the appropriate thing to do. Secondly, that's a big if with regard to animal science, because animal science is examined for more basic purposes. It's difficult to examine what gender an animal may have, because unlike animals engaging in same-sex relationships, differences between the gender and sex of a non-human animal are, as it is, highly impossible to determine.

It should also be noted that appealing to the past doesn't make an argument objective, especially when the end goal of it is to avoid citing the current scientific consensus. It would be like using an older edition of a work on Ancient Rome because the newer editions reject findings you agree with. It's fine to disagree with the newer findings, but it's not an objective approach to just ignore the consensus, after all. I should also note that I personally find it odd to determine my attraction to a person based on reproductive purposes. I mean, sure, that is part of our basic instincts, but we're more than just that, as it were.

Finally, there's also the factor of whether LGBT people are "biologically valuable," which is an issue I find very interesting, in particular due to theories I've read about this, including one theory that suggested that having a gay sibling may improve another sibling's fertility. It's not all cut-and-dry, and if we only look at what people believed back in the day, we inevitably end up missing out a lot of stuff.

Thanks for the new page, James. *fap*

Shit, I @'d myself. I'm not a narcissist, I swear.

Last edited on 09 August 2018, 02:05.

Posted on 09 August 2018, 10:19 by: Xionos

@james_howard
*snerk* No we were just on mIRC and anyone that came remotely close to a tumblerite either got perma banned or kick banned for an hour till they simmered down with their insanity.

I bet Narce here is in favor of combining musical taste into sexual labels... Just because its new.

Posted on 09 August 2018, 17:24 by: NARCE

@Xionos I don't even know what musical sexual labels means, fam. That said, I've not brought up any new ideas regarding how gender operates. I didn't even bring up non-binary people or the gender spectrum (both of which, I might add, are not really controversial ideas within the psychological community, just among fundamentalism).

That said, being a Tumblerite (Tumblrite?) should be based on the way one expresses their ideas, not merely based on whether someone does not agree with you. It's kind of like how I feel on political correctness - political correctness is not just something on the left, the right just is really good at messaging, and therefore people don't really even talk about the fact that a person may be "PC" about, say, jokes about the police, or calling someone a feckless cunt. I've no problem with people making jokes at the expense of extremist rhetoric and reactionary behavior, but let's not pretend that it's just a leftist thing. If you permaban someone for merely expressing a POV that is different from your own, it just makes you look like you can't counter the POV they're expressing. By all means, permaban someone if they're acting like a shit about it, but yeah, it makes you look silly otherwise. Be a true rational, dawg.

On-topic: gosh I'm glad that this didn't take a shit turn, it'd have soured the rest of the comic for me. :u

Posted on 11 August 2018, 15:37 by: bombertroy

It was all a dream.

Posted on 12 August 2018, 00:36 by: randomletterjumble

I have to admit, thinking this comic is a dream *does* make a little more sense than love or affection in a James Howard comic. I think it's real though.

Inb4 The psychiatrist devours them both.

Posted on 12 August 2018, 01:55 by: justdoitmarshall

Batboy is cute but he's going nothing on my boy Gabe

Posted on 14 August 2018, 04:41 by: animasouloss

Oh wow. this gives new meaning to the phase,"pulling out in time"

Posted on 15 August 2018, 22:02 by: leogamer00

NICE ENDING =D

Posted on 16 August 2018, 08:17 by: Reaverbot11

endo really sux

Posted on 16 August 2018, 10:18 by: jimbo21

@james_howard
Back in my day furfags didn't feel the need to bash people over the head with meta commentary trying to ham fistedly justify their own fetishes to the audience.

I say that but i actually kept coming back to this comic just to see how it turned out so I'm still the faggot.

Posted on 16 August 2018, 19:45 by: GroovyMayn

Most people don't have weird fetishes, they acquire them by going online and become more and more depraved over time as their life crumbles around them.

Posted on 20 August 2018, 01:14 by: Tsubasa171

Back in my day, I was a fetus. Now look where I am, killing future fetus

Posted on 21 October 2018, 19:14 by: DarkShadow6

Back in my day, I WHARRRBARGLBLE

Posted on 15 July 2019, 10:00 by: lukman010488

all kinds of fetish in one work... superb!!!

Posted:	2018-06-16 18:08
Parent:	1238961
Visible:	No (Replaced)
Language:	English
File Size:	61.13 MiB
Length:	38 pages
Favorited:	1209 times

language:	english
artist:	james howard
male:	ahegao all the way through anal anal intercourse cumflation dickgirl on male furry inflation mesuiki nakadashi prolapse sole male stomach deformation vore x-ray
female:	ahegao femdom furry long tongue rimjob shemale sole dickgirl tall girl
other:	comic full color multi-work series

Rating:		408
Average: 4.44