Raw: https://e-hentai.org/g/1859022/d2fffb1489/
Alternative scan: https://e-hentai.org/g/1113188/cb6102a6a2/

Thanks for sharing this translation!

Base +46, Dnkz +49

Hmmm, On the one hand I love the art; as always, kan koromoya is amazing. On the other hand, I'm not so fond of the recycled panels. The last two pages are ripped from a previous work wherein Ranma spends her summer break with a man that buys and trains her. I'd have to look harder, but there's other reused paneling in this too.

Otherwise it's a fun read.

Base +8, danielwain +9

Man, don't get me wrong, I love Ranma and how this artist draws him/her, but does it really need the "gender bender" tag if the boy version doesn't even show up or gender bender doesn't really show up at all in the story? I mean, if it's Ranma, shouldn't gender bender just be EXPECTED by default? It's the whole hook of the original manga.
Kinda poisons the well when adding GB to your watchlist when Ranma doujiins pop up that *technically* don't have any GB content in it to speak of. It's the same with Granblue and Cagliostro. Sure it's "canon" GB, but if it doesn't factor into the story/content in any way, does it really need the tag?

Base +2, Gosei -6, AncientPhoenix -7

@CG2324 It's still there so it should be tagged.

Base +6

@wildstag
No, not the last two pages... the last SIX pages were ripped and reused from another one of his comics. I agree... it is really lazy, but in a way it is also pretty funny how he blatantly reused his own content and then changed the story. I mean I know other doujin artists (the one that does a lot of Yuusaki Riko) that constantly redraws the same faces and poses/angles in every single one of his works... but at least that guy actually redraws things. Buta doesn't even retrace his own work, he simply copy and pastes it. But well... my complaint isn't that he reuses his own work... if it had been good and made sense and was included in a bigger work I could have excused it somewhat if it added something... but the problem with Buta is his drawing style. I personally like how "raw" and sloppy it is, but at some point when it gets THIS sloppy it becomes really hard to make sense of what is going on in panels at times. As an example, the story begins with Ranma being fucked/raped by the master of the temple (I would actually really have seen how this came about to be), but in the first sex scene we see her fucked what I guess is doggystyle? In the next panel it is shown she was fucked in the ass... and in the aftermath panel there is a lot of cum covering her genitals. So this raises the question: Was her pussy fucked? Did that Temple master rape her pussy first, or her ass? Did he only drill her ass or did he drill her pussy? Because of how the panels were drawn and because there was no mention of it either way, it leaves you wondering.

What I am saying here is that if you are going to make something that dubious and not make it clear (by having her pussylips be open and sperm clearly leaking from the opening) by covering her up with semen... then as the author you should actually explain it in the text. Something like:

if fucked in the pussy:
"Having fucked all my holes and ravaged me all night long..."

If not fucked in the pussy:
"Having ravaged my ass alone all night long..."

something like that would have helped.

Base +7