https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ01059713.html

That's a shemale, not a tomgirl/futanari.

* "Ojousama-chan"
* Has breasts
* Girl's clothes
* Dick and balls, no vag (= no true futanari)
* Nothing in the story nor the DLSite tags/description describes her as a boy.

Base +9, Fanservicefan +22, BowlingTree +7, Slapdown3 -6, Cabara +6, balaclava +6, LAN5996 -6, ikisugi114514 -6, NewhalfIsMale +10, Lilisionnach +6, Dark Mac -12, stuffandthingsiguess -5, Dein Gott -6, and 4 more...

I mean, it literally says futanari in the title.

Base +6, LAN5996 +6, Lorde Doome +6, XHipster +6, DunkinDNuts +8, balaclava +6, Dark Mac +12, stuffandthingsiguess +5, yourmom777 +6, Dein Gott +6, 三千西瓜suika +6, shadowgrail +7, schhhh39 +4, and 4 more...

it's futanari, the author literally only does futanari and has never made a shemale character.
the title says futanari
the description on the DLsite says futanari, the author tags her as a loli
he literally tags it in the genre as "フタナリ" which is futanari in katakana.

Base +6, schhhh39 +4, LAN5996 +6, TK162 +8

Futanari is a somewhat mythical designation that's supposed to be distinct from non-mythical shemales, despite the fact that they could be visually indistinguishable. While it is correct to call these characters futas based on the author's intentions, the tags on this site actually have definitions that are inconsistent with this author's usage of the term.

Basically vagina = futanari and no vagina = shemale. If everyone would use the tags in a consistent manner, regardless of their convictions, then the tags would be more useful. https://ehwiki.org/wiki/Know_The_Difference#Dickgirls

Well I don't know. I guess I could be wrong if the tag definitions don't represent how most people search for futa. Maybe futas really shouldn't be defined by physical features. It's all kind of absurd..

Base +6

What is absurd is putting Futanari with Schrodinger pussy along with actual Shemales that have confirmed no pussy.

Base +6

the artist can call it whatever they want, but the tags must be correct. rules is rules, or would you rather have a system as bad as rule34?

Base +8, Jec0p +6, hakuryu2250 +23

This artist is a weird one for me, because they have drawn actual futa like in this previous, recent work here: https://e-hentai.org/g/2535841/ff334cb571/.
But having seen most of their previous stuff on this site, it's almost like they get away with not drawing it most of the time because they draw poses where you would never be able to see pussy most of the time for the futa.
Even in that work I listed there's only two panels that I counted where you can tell it's actual futa even though he draws from behind/ass shots all the time. Can't say why they do this exactly, but it does feel inconsistent as hell, and I've seen other artists do the same thing.
Have to agree with people saying tag what you see though, and like Summergraffiti said I don't want the tag system to be as useless as some of the boorus, even if I consider this futa knowing the artist has drawn true futa stuff before.

Base +6, hakuryu2250 -23

https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/108267694

Base +62