https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/109902292
FANZA
https://www.dmm.co.jp/dc/doujin/-/detail/=/cid=d_281512/&af_id=samucha-004&ch=toolbar&ch_id=text

DLsite
https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ01075866.html/?utm_medium=affiliate&utm_campaign=bnlink&utm_content=text

メロン通販
https://www.melonbooks.co.jp/detail/detail.php?product_id=1990790
特典付き数種類用意していただきました

とら通販
https://ec.toranoana.jp/tora_r/ec/item/040031080860/

Base +62, mikegood +7

I don't think this is NTR. DLsite says "恋人同士". Melonbook also tag this as "ラブコメ".

Base +8, Cont +10, player4578 -6, lkoofu +10, ct8s +7, mikegood -7, SisterBrown -9, Palaxius -29, ≥ Д≤ -8, Mrkew +11

@9321j
Yeah,not to mention this mob looks like Rito,so it could totally be seen as him in other world.

Last edited on 31 July 2023, 10:42.

Base +5, lkoofu +10, mikegood -7, SisterBrown -9, Palaxius -29

Author note on the page 2 states what it's a mob. So it's NTR.

Base +22, player4578 +6, stupid army +10, ct8s -7, lkoofu -10, mikegood +7, SisterBrown +9, Palaxius +29, ≥ Д≤ +8, Mrkew -11

I don't think just because she's having sex with a mob made it qualified for NTR tag. It's not like Kotegawa was in relationship even with Rito in this doujin, and the mob was begging for became Kotegawa's boyfriend in the earlier page so it isn't NTR. Having sex with a mob/random stranger isn't a NTR if the boy/girl not in relationship with someone.

@schello555
then other Samurai Ninja Greentea's TLR doujin like Rakuen Keikaku DARKNESS would categorized as NTR, right? But no, it isn't. Rito and Kotegawa in this doujin not being a couple neither there's indication one of them interested each other. Not to mention most of Samurai's TLR doujins not related each other except from what I know the Rakuen Keikaku. Which mean each doujin is their each own "what-if".

Edit: Keep crying y'all NTR fetishists. Your downvotes to me and others wouldn't change the fact that this doujin isn't NTR and the author not trying to advertise the book as such either.

Last edited on 04 August 2023, 08:55.

Base +6, player4578 -6, ct8s +7, mikegood -7, SisterBrown -9, Zantos +7, Palaxius -29, ≥ Д≤ -8, Mrkew +11, SlashSlayer +6, DJ_Puchuu +16

In my belief, if a girl has sex with boys other than mc, unless such girl already has another boyfriend or the like indicated in the original story (Example: Bulma and Vegeta), it is NTR without exception.
If there is no mc in the original story, a girl having sex with a mob may not be NTR if the reader can project itself to such mob (Example: Touhou Project series).

Base +6, player4578 +6, Snake 124 -7, mikegood +7, SisterBrown +9, Zantos -7, Palaxius +29, ≥ Д≤ +8, Mrkew -11, MC Arisato -7

Kotegawa is one of Rito's harem members, so it's obvious NTR if she's with another guy.

@Seabook
Rather, I hate NTR and prefer vanilla lol. No matter how much you deny it, the fact that this doujin contains obvious NTR remains unchanged, and there are plenty of NTR works that the author doesn't tag.

Last edited on 04 August 2023, 11:11.

Base +6, Zantos +7, Palaxius +29, player4578 +6, ≥ Д≤ +8, Mrkew -11

@hogzgkhkt272
Ok show the proof then beside the "mob" and "Yui is Rito's harem" in this exact doujin like the conversation or whatsover. No, there's no proof. Here's the translation of author's note in the 2nd page:

"This 2d work is "if story" about what-if the strictly serious tsundere big boobs girl "Kotegawa Yui" from popular works "ToLove-Ru) got "pushover mob boyfriend"....." It's just simple as that. The notable NTR works from Samurai is one of the Futa Tiffa-Aerith doujin because interaction between Cloud and Tiffa is clear. Here, again, no hint about Yuki-Rito's relationship or even about the "Rito's harem project" by the Deviluke twins.

Base +6, player4578 -6, DJ_Puchuu +16

@hogzgkhkt272

You're correct that this is NTR.

It's also NTR done right. He found his own way to charm her, unorthodox as it was, didn't blackmail her, didn't force her into doing anything and was prepared to call it a day when it didn't work. This is how you actually "steal" a woman. "Part of harem"? So what? Nothing stopping someone from taking that great big leap and going "Hey, shall we?" like this guy. It's still kinda pathetic, though. I mean, if I was the guy in charge of this, I'd have the guy slowly wear her down with a bunch of romantic gestures like flowers, ice cream and tell a few jokes. Future NTR should involve the "try guy" actually putting the effort in being a better man. "Availability is the best ability" after all. No sarcasm meant. This is how NTR should be, if in spirit not in essence: by winning her over the other guy with actual attempts.

Base +7

This is clearly not a NTR. Why are there so many idiots who think it is? I don't understand.
As #c9312 @9312j said, even on the site where it's being sold, it's perceived as a "love comedy, between lovers" so why are the idiots calling it NTR?

Last edited on 06 September 2023, 07:16.

Base +6