https://twitter.com/Typpo8

If Ai is so bad, why aren't artists making original content? Why pay for art if a bot can do it for free!

Base +6, Graham Aker -8, Queenslander -7, Hugh Jarse -6, blargblah -6, vapunl +6, supersecretaccount -5, da_mutz2000 -6, metallicafan53 -6, Fakeplastic -6, anastasiya_ -8, 可爱的金发孩子 -6, Super_Hornet -7, and 19 more...

@tubo So, why are you looking at Typo's work? You say "A bot can do it for free". SInce AI "art" is equiivalent to human art according to you then you should not need another manmade picture for the rest of your life. Just look at AI generated art and forget that artists exist, since in your opinion they offer nothing in exchange for the drawbacks of time labor and temperament.

Base +6, Graham Aker +8, XisaleX +6, 可爱的金发孩子 +6, coatmadeofbananas +6, swordpaladin +9, ZlewFuckersa +6, Ammendum +6, Black Quarterback +6, OrgPanzer +2, RyuuHawke +6, wmybill +6, Vaewinged +8

@KlumsyK
Because some artists can't draw for shit, and many others who can draw make pictures that are so uninspired and by the numbers, what's even the point? If a hundred thousand artists all draw the same shit, it doesn't matter that 90% of that number does it well on a technical level, it's no different from AI. Passion, inspiration, vision, now those are things AI can't and never will be able to copy, after all it's just a bunch of code designed to layer what it finds online and smooth out the edges. This isn't 2013, being good at digital art is not good enough anymore, too many people can do it and there is AI to boot. If an artist has no vision and just draws naked anime girls in that bland, shiny style that's everywhere, and charges 300$ for a commission, they are going to fail.

Base +6, OrgPanzer -2, 10%Deku -4, exe3212978485 -6, hkjgjg +6, Vaewinged -8