Something I found while scrolling through inkbunny.

The artist claims that they're drawing these and then they have the Ai come in afterwards to polish it up.

I'm calling bull on that, but hey! Porn is porn, so whatevs.

Guys got more so I'll upload what I can.

I cropped some of the Applebloom strip cause this site compressed it all and made it look all shitty, then replaced all the shittier crops with the stand alone "art."

Yeah I agree, seems too AI-made. Could be the opposite; they make AI do the work, and then they do the finishing touches.

Base +10, Kidvideo +6, darkblane257 +8, dasdk +9, fflit +7, unreaved +6, Leader of Chaos +20, Huffenpuff +6, albertzeb +6, Souloname +7, loginamess +6, Gremrock +5

Spike's number of digits seem consistently four with three toes on each feet.
So, at least the artist cleaned up afterwards. ^^
The bear paws are a mess, though.

Base +8, salv10 +6, darkblane257 +8, fflit +7, Leader of Chaos +20, Killfuck Soulshitter +6, Gremrock +5

I'm not sure what the Ai level is with the artist+works, but I will say that an odd detail that happens sometimes is that Spike is 'furry'. You can see it in the Applejack image near his shoulders/knees, and there's another series with Applebloom on inkbunny with the same 'fuzziness'. This is also in the Twilight picture*, but noticeably he's not fuzzy in the Fluttershy picture so it doesn't seem to be the artist just draws Spike with fur.

Also, Spike's penis looks different in all 3 of these (balls in first two but different color penis, no balls I can see in Applejack or the Applebloom one on inkbunny).

*Also, Spike might have hooves in the Twilight one? The very bottoms of the feet are 'off screen', but his right foot has something near the bottom of it and since I can't see nails and his legs are fuzzy in this one, I think it might have gave him hooves.

Base +8, salv10 +6, darkblane257 +8, fflit +7, Maxim xaos +6, Gremrock +5

on their inkbunny profile this "artist" says

>I have been having a joy of a time, experimenting with AI Generation, so I wanted to make a separate account to begin sharing a small subset of the piles of images I have been crafting with this AI. Lets welcome Aisha owo

and all their uploads are tagged ai, including these. Aisha appears to be their deer cub fursona that they ai generated.

Base +7, fflit +7, darkblane257 +8, PinkMask +10, albertzeb +6

This is why I hate these people man, I am filtering AI because I don't want to see it, stop leaving the tag off, you know why you are leaving it off because you feel entitled to peoples eyes and you are not.

Base +6, shrek789 -6, geemer +6, coxdia +7, darkblane257 +8, PinkMask +10, albertzeb +6, Lethal68 +6

@Xeogen

How do you do that?

I've been trying to tag it as Ai, but it doesn't do it.

EDIT: Nevermind, I figured it out.

Nevermind that nevermind, the site won't let me tag this as ai.

I've tried "group:ai" "artist:ai" and "character:ai" but it keeps removing the tags.

Last edited on 10 March 2024, 20:23.

Base +6, liquid_dump +6, Wuzzlefluff +6, darkblane257 +8, PinkMask -10, albertzeb -6, Thaviel +6, Gremrock +5

@p3rez I believe the correct tag is "other:ai generated"

Base +8, Leader of Chaos +20, darkblane257 +8, Thaviel +6, Gremrock +5

@Xeogen
@p3rez
@agreg

The AI_Generated tag is different from many of the others. It's not one that can be added or voted upon. From the tag definition page:
"This tag is handled by an auto-tagger"
Description: Contains the [AI Generated] indicator within the title.

So the title needs to have [AI Generated] in it. Without that string the tag wont be added, HOWEVER, there are two exceptions:
"Do NOT add this to galleries where AI involvement was directly denied by the uploader in the uploader comment, within the work, or on the credits page of the uploader/group."
Which as an exception doesn't counts since the artist admits to using it.

"It is not applicable if AI was only used as a tool in the process of creating something that does not have the obvious visual appearance of being AI-generated, e.g. if it was painted over."

Which the author is likely claiming. That they made an initial AI image but then cleaned it up/painted over.

This might warrant a new tag, like "AI Assisted', but that probably would be seen as a "bad tag" since from wiki,
"Software - The tools the artist used to created the content are irrelevant."

Base +9, fflit +7, darkblane257 +8, jm320 +21, Upshoo +6, albertzeb +6, Thaviel +6, Gremrock +5, Berndibernd +6

This uploader/person can't even keep anatomy consistent, regardless of "painting over" results, it's plainly obviously AI garbage and should be tagged as such.

Base +6, senrath +9, PinkMask +10, albertzeb +6, Holsterbau -6, Isodif +6, Shakemaster11 -6, Berndibernd -6

OK, I think I got it this time.

I put "[AI Generated]" in the title like JunkAlot stated, and the tag came up.

fingers crossed it stays that way!

Base +6, PinkMask -10, Berndibernd +6

Who tf is rating this garbage?

Base +7, Holsterbau -6, Berndibernd -6, Rigged2Win +7