I guess I'm just the Hitoi guy now. Got lazy and kind of rushed it, might make a better version with moans translated. Please support the original artist https://hitoi.fanbox.cc/

It's great to know that you've become the Hitoi guy, you're going to save his doujins from the hands of the MTLs. Thanks for sharing.

Base +18, Fofotron +25, as102 +15, limd +11, Shades of Blue +7, sssss465 +6

This is not NTR. Just a random drunken gang rape. The girl does not get attached to the rapists. And the fact of the rape remains unsolved. There are zero components of NTR here.

Base +24, Olivki +6, UnchieZ -6, AuthlimOfXvim +6, limd +11, MaxwellCoffee +7, phantomruler -6, Zantos -7, Yossarian762 -7, SpiritOrg -8, sssss465 +6, jj2202 +2, seeinghighdog +8

The "rape" tag is correct.

Base +6, jj2202 +2

ah, a girl drunk dead with a bunch of random guys

the only situation that have same ending both in IRL and hentailand

Base +45, jj2202 +2

@ Coledas Ukgent. If Ill be honest, I do use gpt to double check my grammar. It's been several years since I actually studied Japanese and informal phrasing is not included in that. I tried to be as accurate to original text. Glad you enjoyed it.

@ Nikita78. I mean, it's a married woman getting fucked by guys who knew her and probably her husband in high school/college. Also it's a short spin-off of an NTR series, She is Konoha's mom from Ochiba Nikki. Also pretty much everything this artist makes is NTR in some form.

Base +6, Zantos +7, Fofotron +25, sssss465 +6

@ 鉄夜 緋村.
but this does not change the fact that in this case there is not a single element that would characterize this particular story as NTR. read tag description:
* Requires story elements showing the relationship between A and B, where they either are in a romantic partnership, or A has a romantic interest for B. B being taken away from A must be a notable part of the story.
* If the relationship between A and B is established in canon rather than as part of the story, then A must appear or be (directly or indirectly) referenced in the work in a relevant way for the tag to be applicable.
* Does not apply if all parties (A, B and C) are shown to be happy and satisfied with the resulting polyamorous relationships, except if the focus for the majority of the work is on A having B taken from them.
* If A and B are in a romantic partnership, and B is not coerced or raped, then cheating also qualifies.

Base +24, SpiritOrg -8

@Nikita78 It's just a tag man, but if we really want to go into details:

Description: There is a friendly/familiar or reciprocal relationship between A (Minori's Husband) and B (Minori) (They are married with 2 daughters), and B has sex with a third party C (the guys). A does not consent to it or is unaware of the activity (he is likely overseas and unaware).

Notes: A reciprocal relationship does not require reciprocal romance. Examples are childhood friends, personal friends, classmates, or work colleagues. (This simply states that A and B do not have to be married or a couple for this to qualify)

Requires story elements showing the relationship between A and B, where they either are in a romantic partnership, or A has a romantic interest for B. B being taken away from A must be a notable part of the story. (Depending on your definition of 'taken away' this would be your only argument)

If the relationship between A and B is established in canon rather than as part of the story, then A must appear or be (directly or indirectly) referenced in the work in a relevant way for the tag to be applicable (Husband is mentions multiple times).

Does not apply if all parties (A, B and C) are shown to be happy and satisfied with the resulting polyamorous relationships, except if the focus for the majority of the work is on A having B taken from them. (N/A)

If A and B are in a romantic partnership, and B is not coerced or raped, then cheating also qualifies. (States that if A was not blackmailed or raped, cheating can included, not that it's not NTR)

If that doesn't satisfy you then we can go to the flowchart.

A (Husband) is instigating B (Minori) to have sex with C (the guys)?
No
Reciprocal romantic relationship between A & B?
Yes (Again, they are married with 2 daughters)
B consents to sex with C?
No
Netorare

If you still think that the NTR tag should be removed, that's fine, but I don't think saying that "there is not a single element that would characterize this particular story as NTR" is not exactly right either. If I'm still wrong, tell me how and I'll be more careful tagging next time since I'm still kind of new to uploading here.

Base +6

I presume that the "buy alright with you, right?" on page 6 is a typo

otherwise v good 11/10

Base +6

@HimeNyan It is lmao. Thanks for catching that. I said I got lazy and rushed it.

Base +6