why do people rate regular comics with an automatic "1' vote? Sure, it's not wank material, but there is plenty of that here. It's nice to have things like this preserved, and for free.

Base +6, Bane13 +60

smullville , i really dont know

Base +7, muddlehead +5

@smullville I'm rating this with 0.5 because I've ACTUALLY read it, man.

I've USED this comic in the past (it is an old one... 1986, maybe older than you are) as an actual teaching aid - as an example of BAD writting.

A (not-so) shinning example of how, even if a taked-on, unearned happy ending is the trademark of a bad writter, a tacked-on "edgier than you" ending that undoes all the plot development, all the character development, and all the meaning of every action the characters have taken before, is the trademark of a WORSE writter who also actually believes to be hot shit for writting "mature stuff for mature readers like myself". Want an unhappy ending? Write one that does NOT make your entire work irrelevant. Hint: guys like. Aeschylus, Sophocles or Euripides (a.k.a. "The three great masters of Greek tragedy") were doing EXACTLY that since the 5 century BC. It's a great concept than the author of this crap would have known, had he had more talent or more letters, quoting Cyrano.

So, a well.earned 0.5 for this crap, and not "because it is nor fappable", since it actually is. Damn, G'wel is HOT....

Base +16, drkfire666 +6, blabbo +6