Tosaka BWC 2 [Blimberryjuice] (Fate/stay night)

Posted on 30 November 2025, 03:37 by: BlimberryJuice

Uploader Comment

This is my bleached and decensored edit of a new comic from the artist Giga, its rather crude content but I hope you enjoy it.

Posted on 28 November 2025, 21:49 by: kaerFlanA

who cares man, it‘s funny

Posted on 28 November 2025, 22:04 by: Fategoartyom

get a life

Posted on 28 November 2025, 22:06 by: BossMizuryu

Brother is trying to be all "We are the wooorld We are the peopleee" with Bleached edits hooly

Posted on 28 November 2025, 22:35 by: KuruFapJikan

(edited)

(Apologies for commenting here. As I mentioned earlier, my post-nut clarity eventually cleared, and I regret getting involved in this kind of topic. I have deleted what I wrote here.)

Last edited on 29 November 2025, 21:36.

Posted on 28 November 2025, 22:37 by: baugbaug

poor EMIYA alter

Posted on 28 November 2025, 22:43 by: BlimberryJuice

@KuruFapJikan I like black women I like humiliation and netorare , I guess its not the content that bothers me at all its the atmosphere of resentment I felt from this. So i retract my statement , this is perfectly acceptable content if you don't take it seriously, this one just felt different to me

Posted on 28 November 2025, 23:02 by: KuruFapJikan

(edited)

What the fuck did I just write? Fuck my post-nut clarity.

Last edited on 29 November 2025, 06:07.

Posted on 28 November 2025, 23:41 by: Waitugreat

These edits are always welcome, not just for the faps alone but more for the comment section. hihi

btw, it would have been nice if the dark skin Rin would wear white stockings as this would make a great contrast.

Thank you for the translation and edit!

Posted on 28 November 2025, 23:52 by: aby2sal

The 1st version would be 5 stars if you renamed it to "if the characters were tainted by the Grail's mud"

Posted on 28 November 2025, 23:55 by: KuruFapJikan

(edited)

(Apologies for commenting here. As I mentioned earlier, my post-nut clarity eventually cleared, and I regret getting involved in this kind of topic. I have deleted what I wrote here.)

Last edited on 29 November 2025, 21:36.

Posted on 29 November 2025, 00:08 by: BlimberryJuice

@KuruFapJikan I like african girls more then darkskinned girls but both are good, and yes I just like the fetish I dont hate anyone (based on race) I am not "perpetually consumed by hatred" lmao. all these characters are original to me because I don't play these games or watch whatever anime they are from

@Waitugreat I wanted to do an alternate were her eyes are brown and she has blue or red ribbons in her hair instead of black so I will probably make that alternate with white or grey stockings like you requested

Posted on 29 November 2025, 00:11 by: KuruFapJikan

(edited)

(Apologies for commenting here. As I mentioned earlier, my post-nut clarity eventually cleared, and I regret getting involved in this kind of topic. I have deleted what I wrote here.)

Last edited on 29 November 2025, 21:36.

Posted on 29 November 2025, 06:10 by: BingleWingle

@BlimberryJuice I appreciate you dedicating the time to this! I'm always looking forward to your uploads.

Posted on 29 November 2025, 10:58 by: Rihr4

i can't breath.

Posted on 30 November 2025, 03:43 by: Waitugreat

Oh wow, you're already done working on the version with Rin wearing white stockings. Looks great!

God bless you.

Posted on 30 November 2025, 04:08 by: BlimberryJuice

@Waitugreat and God bless you, have a good weekend

Posted on 30 November 2025, 04:12 by: Wilfriback

lmao she looks like that one cosplayer.

Posted on 30 November 2025, 06:16 by: Chen Nyan~

What the fuck is this cancerous bullshit?

Posted on 30 November 2025, 06:20 by: F4c31t

omg it's nigga

Posted on 30 November 2025, 07:00 by: ww2214028

this is purely disgusting

Posted on 30 November 2025, 21:59 by: Krilos

There is something special about a bunch of cucky white and asian "blacked" dudes whining about these "bleached" edits being "racist", when their entire fetish is fetishizing and stereotyping black men as violent, animal-like rapists and criminals and getting off to it. Look into a fucking mirror lmao.

Posted on 01 December 2025, 21:01 by: Orengestar

@Krilos looking at a mirror would require them to have the mental capacity to realize WHAT to look for in their reflection and WHY looking at a mirror is needed.

Posted on 02 December 2025, 09:28 by: saintwalker1

You guys obviously don't know fate lore. Now hear me out there's a reason for this! First of all you can burn your skin when using too much mana...

Posted on 02 December 2025, 18:23 by: KuruFapJikan

To be honest, there's something I want to get off my chest. At first, I didn't want to get involved and I only felt philosophical because of post-nut clarity. However, my curiosity has unfortunately been piqued since I spend so much time on this site, so I would like to say a few things as neutrally as possible.

There’s something worth laying out more broadly, since this entire conversation keeps circling the same points without acknowledging the full picture.

People call “BBC” racist, but the dynamic is almost never created by Black communities themselves. The category was built, popularized, and industrialized by white and Asian consumers, studios, and artists. The supposed “threat” or “dominance” assigned to Black men in that porn exists because those same groups engineered it as a fetish. It’s an artificial enemy—an ego construct shaped by modern societies where sexual kinks, cuckold fantasies, and power inversions flourish in relatively peaceful, stable environments.

Meanwhile, “bleached” edits usually come from open resentment or political projection. If people genuinely wanted to “push back,” you’d expect forms of raceplay that target their own groups’ insecurities—white-on-Asian cuckoldry, for instance—not recycled inversions of the same fetish they already participate in. Instead, everything loops back to white-created narratives about Black bodies.

That’s why the whole BBC versus “bleached” discourse looks self-contradictory. Both sides are manufactured by the same demographics. It’s white people fetishizing Black men on one end, and white people producing racially charged “counter-content” on the other. The outrage only appears when the dominance shifts, even though the same logic drives both categories.

This creates a strange problem: if whites and Asians are both the originators and the critics of these trends, how exactly is “Blackness” the supposed source of the issue? Black people end up being tossed between roles—fetish object, threat, symbol—depending on what the surrounding society needs at that moment. They become commodities in narratives that were never theirs.

And this ties into a deeper point:

Many Black-majority countries were built on frameworks imposed externally. The borders, languages, educational structures, and governmental models weren’t developed by the populations living there; they were inherited from colonial systems that didn’t reflect local identities. Without a unified historical foundation, shared cultural architecture, or long-term national design, large-scale industrial development becomes difficult to self-generate. The resources are there—water, land, manpower, energy—but the internal societal structures that create coordinated development were interrupted or never allowed to form organically.

So when sexualized racial archetypes emerge in Western media, Black people are inserted into roles crafted by external imagination, not roles stemming from their own cultural trajectory. The fetish, the backlash, the discourse—all of it originates outside the community, yet the community ends up being the symbolic site of the argument.

On Which Form of Raceplay Is “More Severe”

If you strip away the porn labels and the tribal arguments, the only things that matter are who created the narrative and who is being positioned as inferior inside that narrative.

In both BBC and “bleached” content, the answer to the first question is the same: these fantasies were created and popularized by whites (and sometimes Asians), not by Black communities. So neither category expresses real Black domination or real Black authorship. They’re both white-written racial scripts constructed for white consumption. That’s the baseline.

From there, the severity splits in two very different ways.

White-dominant raceplay (“bleached”) reinforces actual, historical power structures. It mirrors colonialism, segregation, and real systems that oppressed Black people. It draws directly from institutional violence and real-world domination. It has cultural weight because it echoes a hierarchy that existed and still shapes society. Its severity is high because it aligns with centuries of real oppression and real power, not fantasy.

Black-dominant raceplay (BBC) is still white- or Asian-created; it is not a product of Black culture. It functions as a fetish inversion built around white sexual anxieties. It comes from white guilt, fear, resentment, and the eroticization of self-degradation. There is no historical precedent of Black institutional dominance over whites for it to reflect. It turns Black bodies into props for a white fantasy about power loss, not actual Black agency. Its severity is lower in structural weight because it doesn’t reflect any real historical domination, though it is still racialized and dehumanizing in its own way.

The core observation is that these two things are not symmetrical. White-dominant raceplay mirrors actual history and carries real cultural weight, making it more severe. Black-dominant raceplay is an inversion kink invented by the same groups and rooted in their own psychology, making it less severe in structural impact. Both are racial distortions, but only one reflects a hierarchy that actually existed.

Posted on 03 December 2025, 01:53 by: BlimberryJuice

@KuruFapJikan "no Black institutional dominance over whites for it to reflect." what is south Africa. whites established colonies in south Africa before anyone was living there including blacks, look how well the black controlled government served "its people" if you want to see an example of what your talking about.
south Africa is what they want in the west, its bad for both parties only (((they))) benefit, please dont pretend like the people who died there never existed

Last edited on 03 December 2025, 02:16.

Posted on 03 December 2025, 09:15 by: KuruFapJikan

@BlimberryJuice You brought up South Africa as if it proves “Black institutional dominance” over whites. It doesn’t. What happened there isn’t some example of a coherent Black-led system rising and overpowering anyone. It’s what happens in any collapsed state: retaliation, killings, land-driven violence, and power vacuums.

African groups killed white farmers. White groups killed African civilians. Entire populations were displaced. None of this is unique — it’s the same pattern you see in every unstable region on earth. It’s not “Black power.” It’s the fallout of a colonial framework collapsing on top of people who inherited borders and institutions designed by foreigners.

If you want to talk about violence, Africa already has Muslims massacring Christians, Christians massacring Muslims in reprisal, tribes killing each other over land and cattle, and militias wiping out whole villages over resources. Western morality doesn’t originate there; it was imported. The violence is real, but the Western moral lens isn’t. The West only sees its own dead as “global tragedies” because Western media broadcasts itself to the world. The same events elsewhere are treated as “normal instability.”

Your framing treats white deaths as uniquely significant while ignoring identical patterns everywhere else. That’s not analysis — that’s Western exceptionalism applied selectively.

And the way you jump to “(((they)))” only completes the cycle. Whites online blaming Jews for every Western failure is the same behavior they accuse Africans of when Africans blame whites for their collapse. It’s a ladder: every group blames the group above them. It has nothing to do with truth — it’s just how humans process power.

If whites say Africans should “take responsibility” for their own societies instead of blaming colonial powers, then the same rule applies to the West. If Europe collapses because of immigration, political mismanagement, or internal weakness, then that collapse belongs to Europeans. Not Jews, not immigrants, not anyone else. By your own logic, powerlessness in the face of an outside force means you were structurally weak. The West applied that logic to Africa for a century. It doesn’t get to abandon it now that the mirror is pointed back at itself.

You can’t demand responsibility from others while outsourcing your own. If Africa’s failures are an internal problem, then so are Europe’s. If Africa collapsed because it couldn’t resist external pressure, then so will the West. The framework is the same; the scale is the only difference.

You can’t have it both ways.

Also, Western morality functions less as an organic ethical system and more as a psychological restraint engineered through culture, education, religion, and institutional messaging. It conditions people to see certain responses—even those rooted in survival instincts or social stability—as morally unacceptable. The weight of this morality comes from repetition, social reinforcement, and state power, not from any inherent human principle.

In contrast, many third-world societies operate without this externally imposed framework. Morality there is often local, situational, and secondary to immediate material conditions. When something is perceived as a threat—political, ethnic, or economic—it is treated as an obstacle to be removed, not as a moral dilemma. This is why conflicts escalate with fewer psychological brakes: the culture does not embed abstract universal ethics as mechanisms that override pragmatic action.

Western countries, despite having large populations and technological advantages, are often limited by their own moral programming. People may feel endangered or destabilized by state decisions—such as mass immigration policies—but the internalized moral framework prevents them from acting outside approved channels. The government, meanwhile, operates on geopolitical or economic incentives rather than on preserving cultural cohesion, which creates a conflict between state action and population instinct.

The result is a structural asymmetry:
Western societies judge themselves according to moral systems that they imposed on themselves, while expecting the rest of the world—whose moral systems were shaped by different historical pressures—to adhere to the same standards. This disconnect produces predictable outcomes: paralysis in the West, escalation elsewhere.

Last edited on 03 December 2025, 10:21.

Posted on 03 December 2025, 10:58 by: BlimberryJuice

@KuruFapJikan Its insane you divert blame from the small hats while they spare no expense to sabotage the lives of innocent people whenever they can. I specifically brought up south Africa because everyone more or less got on and it wasn't so bad until a poisonous ideology created by (((them))) to specifically villainize whites and justify violence was spread to them (just like its being spread in the west). You are right their has always been violence between different groups its rather natural but we need to move forward as humans and we seem to have an issue with a (((very powerful cabal))) who desperately want to create racial tensions so they can depopulate the only intellectual competitors they have and replace them with easily manipulated serviles.
You talk about moral systems but I insist anyone with a soul can see their 0 sum mindset is immoral. They literally worship evil, greed and lies ( Baal hammon, Moloch, and Satan respectively). So no I dont think Africans need to "take responsibility" when they are being constantly sabotaged by propaganda and corruption, I think the people poisoning them with these lies need to go, the people I demand responsibility from is (((them))) because they are the responsible party. why did you stop messaging me on the forum why do we have to hash this out in my gallery btw?

Posted on 03 December 2025, 11:35 by: KuruFapJikan

@BlimberryJuice Oh, okay. I respect your stance. I was just dropping my two cents; I don’t really care for politics and honestly want immigration stopped so bills don’t keep going up. (Also, I messaged you on the forum, but you didn’t respond. I started talking here to air out my thoughts since this topic unfortunately got caught on my radar because of how much time I spend on this site.)

While I respect your perspective, there are some points I feel need to be clarified. First, the original reason this conversation started: racial tensions due to porn. From what I’ve seen, isn’t it just a back-and-forth inside white and Asian spaces? Why create bleached content if your stance is opposition to racial tension? Is it because you don’t like seeing whites portrayed as submissive all the time and want to even the playing field? Given your feelings of resentment, I assume part of the motivation isn’t just personal taste, right?

Regarding the other points, “soul” has nothing to do with it; my arguments about morality play a much larger role and can’t be ignored. The West is drunk on its own self-sabotage through morality. As for the Jewish issue, I’ve never cared about corruption so long as it doesn’t interfere with my own pursuits. If white societies are being undermined by an outside force, they need to address it themselves. Diversity is not a strength; unity is. Diversity is what has stagnated Africa, and the West could follow the same cycle. History shows this pattern repeats: if the West loses unity, it becomes a modernized version of Africa.

I’m not siding with Jews—I’m neutral. I brought them up only because this conversation caught my attention, as I said at the beginning.

Ah, right. I’m not diverting blame from Jews; I’m saying their actions are effective because of the internal weakness of those being targeted. It’s the same pattern as any country colonized by the West in the past. You don’t see Muslims expressing remorse for colonizing Africa—there’s no internalized guilt to exploit—so the West leaves them alone.

As I said before, Western countries, despite large populations and technological advantages, are often constrained by their own moral programming. People may feel threatened or destabilized by state decisions—mass immigration policies, for example—but their internalized moral framework prevents action outside approved channels. Meanwhile, governments operate on geopolitical or economic incentives rather than preserving cultural cohesion, creating a disconnect between state action and population instinct.

The West is declining because of this moral constraint. People cannot unify effectively because morality is an abstracted construct, leveraged as a tool to divide and ideologically capture populations according to the environments and conditioning that shaped them over time.

Posted on 03 December 2025, 12:03 by: BlimberryJuice

@KuruFapJikan you dident get my message on the forums? I did respond , as for you wanting immigration to stop, its only this bad right now because its being used as a malign tool to cause harm, actually immigration done right and responsibly is great. the self sabotage the West is drunk on is a created thing , it was made this way on purpose this was completely forced on us after allowing them 100% uncontested control over the education/justice system and the media and I think the decline your talking about would just go away if the bad actors pushing it were made to stop. Again I create this stuff for lots of reasons, one of which is I just like black girls I will move towards something more vanilla in my next edit.

Posted on 03 December 2025, 12:38 by: KuruFapJikan

@BlimberryJuice Oh, messages not appearing has happened before with someone else. I’ll ask people I know why that may have happened. Yeah, I just want the political conflict and tension to die down. As you said, immigration done right can be beneficial. Russia is an example: importing educated foreigners who come specifically to learn, work, or integrate with the culture. Mass immigration, by contrast, brings waves of people—often uneducated and aligned with the chaotic culture they come from. Criminals exist in every society, especially poor ones, but politicians pushing mass immigration often portray even criminals as good because it serves their interests, not the people’s.

Mass immigration can damage racial relations over time. For example, the African American community in the 1960s–90s was stronger and more unified; diversity has since eroded that cohesion. I suspect this diversity was implanted externally, much like what is happening in white societies. There will always be bad actors, but the duration of goodwill among the general population is uncertain. Sooner or later, societal pressures may lead people to abandon moral constraints, potentially sparking larger conflicts. What doesn’t kill a society immediately strengthens the governing powers and politicians who profit from the chaos.

Corruption has always existed in human history; the West added layers of moral structure, turning historical events into tangible topics for discussion and influencing public conclusions. In some third-world contexts, Muslims maintain unity through shared religion, allowing coordinated action against other cultures. Africa becomes a target because diversity has fragmented its populations, making them weaker. Meanwhile, the strict focus of Muslims limits the industrial and technological development seen in the West. They devote most of their time to their religion rather than anything else.

Also, vanilla content sounds nice as well.

Ah, I found your PM.

Last edited on 03 December 2025, 17:19.

Posted on 04 December 2025, 21:39 by: Krilos

@KuruFapJikan Since you asked the same yourself, why do you post so much BBC?

You have 900 galleries specifically named tagged BBC, and many, many more thousands of others, i'd wager, where it's a dark skinned man and a light skinned woman,
most of them impoperly tagged. Clearly you must like it, no? But you're not a woman that's into black dudes, and neither are you a black man, right?
That's assuming, since i'd estimate the amount of black men on this site is very, very low.

Want me to be real my dude? I've actually lived in poor, trashy neighborhoods my entire life, most of them where black people are a majority.
Most of my friends are not white, and yet, almost everywhere where blacks were in the majority they were unimaginably racist,
cruel and oppressive toward anybody who wasn't black. Not all of them, but as a general rule. Some food for thought.

I still don't hate black people today despite being on the receiving end of it because, well, I have actually interacted and been friends with them as well, and
I am mature enough to realize people don't come as a package, and that in the end they are just fucking themselves over in a perpetual circle of violence
and destruction which will only end when they decide they've had enough of it.

But you wanna know what? There is a group I actively do hate, and its not the jews. I realized that that is why even taking a glimpse at anything related to BBC pisses me off;
it's because I can tell from a fucking mile its made and consumed by those same piece of shit middle-upper class white and asian wokescold fucks that will bail every fucking
murderer and rapist and won't even charge him as long as his skin is a bit dark, that will lionize "positive discrimination" for virtue points in colleges against whites and asians,
knowing they themselves are going to get a free-pass because their parents are donors, and that it is only going to affect the poors anyway.
That will do the same in employment, while also being a bunch of utter nepotistic fucks to each other.

That don't give a shit about gorceries and rent going up so high in price nobody can afford them, and instead spend their lives caring
only about performative causes and justice because they were already set up for life by their daddies and mommies from the moment they were born.
("We are going to sit here and block the highway with our bodies for the sake of ""ThE EnVIoROnMent", so you end up getting fired because
you miss work, and then you can't afford rent so you get evicted! But who cares you are just a poor, we are justified because we're
fighting "for justice" or something, and then we are going to get ourselves a mocha latte and go on vacation to Switzerland.")

That consume fucking porn about black men, depicted honestly, as nearly subhuman, as criminals, rapists and murderers because that is the way they internalize black men
"from the hood, bro" despite all their virtue signaling because they have never interacted on a personal level with a single fucking real black dude whos parents werent judges or lawyers.

Really, general NTR outside BBC is just an extension of this whole phenomenon; a fetishization of their own self-perceived lack of sexual virility because of being raised in a cucked environment
dominated by ideas centered around men and masculinity being the greatest evil in existence. So they cling to the only source of masculinity they perceive as "accepted"; the rappers and
gangbangers, bandits, mafia guys, criminals and murderers they see depicted on TV, and then utilize black men as their own fucked up self-onanist idol to repair their damaged egos.

Who are ok with everywhere becoming more insecure: openly, vigorously and even with overt threats, championing bringing in millions and millions of unvetted
adult male immigrants from violent third world countries so long as they are kept outside of their own, rich neighborhoods, thank you very much.
Because oh, will they raise hell and use their influence immediately if you even suggest putting a single unvetted immigrant that they themselves forced
us to fucking host near their schools and living spaces! Those are for the poors and their daughters and little girls to deal with, you see?

I hate them, I hate them, I hate them and I hate every single thing they fucking represent. Every single moment I happen to even smell a single one of them.
Everything they are in, and everything they make. And I know its not good, so I try to focus on myself. But as for unity? That unity you were talking about my brother?
I'm sorry but I don't think that's where things are headed. I don't think there is going to be a compromise. If I had to take a guess, the previous social order that has ruled
since the 70s will be broken, and something new will take its place. That is how we will achieve unity. I say this because, the amount of men, especially young and
working class men today who feel similarly, and often much more radically than I do is simply too big, most dudes I talk to on the streets, really.
It's growing every day still.

And with that I've said everything I wanted to say, I won't make any more posts because really, this is not the place to talk about this, but you can feel free to reply if you feel like it.
I'm not accusing you of anything, but I just wanted to write down my feelings about this since you started this conversation yourself.

Posted on 05 December 2025, 04:57 by: BlimberryJuice

@Krilos I like how you said "There is a group I actively do hate, and its not the jews" and then spent a paragraph complaining about issues they have forced on us, extremely typical

Posted on 05 December 2025, 13:16 by: KuruFapJikan

@Krilos I get you. And yeah, I kind of dropped this topic here out of nowhere. This is a porn site — people come here to detach, not to let politics become intrusive noise while they’re just trying to escape into porn. But since what you said was sincere, I’ll respond.

As for the BBC stuff: for me it never started as anything racial. It was everywhere in hentai, and I’m just as much of a degenerate weeb as anyone wasting time online on anime and porn, so I consumed it the same way I consume everything else. I like rape, mindbreak, contrast, the intensity — the usual degeneracy. I don’t consciously racialize it, but I’m not avoiding it either. Sometimes I self-insert as the cuck, sometimes as the bull. The race of the bull doesn’t inherently matter, I just find the BBC scenarios hot.

I never had political allegiances, and most of these online conflicts weren’t even on my radar until the last few years. But you’re right about how people treat it. A lot of BBC fans frame blacks the same way they frame monsters, animals, or goblins. You see BBC paired with bestiality constantly — like it’s just another menu combo. Hilichurls in Genshin are literally monsters, yet people map them onto blacks without hesitation. It’s not “elevating” blacks over whites. It’s commodifying them the same way you’d commodify any archetype.

The left reinforces this. They internalize blacks as some subhuman or monstrous category and then project that assumption outward as if everyone else sees them the same way. When people call blacks “goblins” or “monkeys,” it comes from accumulated racial tension and narrative pressure, not from porn itself. And for the people into this kink, blacks become an ego-commodity: something tied to their self-image, not an actual identity they engage with.

Their ego is structured around morality — their version of morality becomes an emotional container for their identity. Anything that makes them feel validated becomes “right” and anything that disrupts that moral self-image becomes “wrong.” It’s not about race; it’s about how their politics and porn consumption share the same psychological scaffolding.

And the reason this even works is because of how society digests reality in the first place.

Society runs on dominant assumptions. Those assumptions shape everything — culture, interpretation, priorities. Once they’re entrenched, they don’t need evidence anymore. Events aren’t analyzed; they’re retrofitted into whatever narrative already dominates. That shuts down deeper examination. As long as something “feels” like it fits the established worldview, nobody demands proof. Political factions — especially the left — exploit this. Their claims aren’t “misreadings of data”; most of the time there is no data. But it doesn’t matter. Their followers accept it automatically because it matches the moral framework they’ve already internalized. If the framework says “men oppress women,” then any claim that reinforces that idea is instantly treated as true, even without evidence. Reality isn’t examined anymore; it’s bent to match the ideological template.

That’s why people can consume porn where blacks are monsters or objects while simultaneously pretending to hold moral positions about race. The ideology gives them a ready-made interpretation, and they never step outside it.

Last edited on 05 December 2025, 19:37.

Posted on 16 December 2025, 21:47 by: velikynovgorod

race war when?

Posted on 23 December 2025, 16:37 by: 乳酸菌114514

It really could happen a lot in the history of triangle trade.

Posted on 30 December 2025, 03:19 by: faggotkys

coonbois mad

Posted on 30 December 2025, 06:25 by: Itg765

this guy always has the best comment sections

for whatever reason people get mad on bleached edits but never say a word in all the blacked doujinshi lmao

Posted on 03 January 2026, 16:19 by: Bakster123

I'm only going to read this work because I see ridiculous walls of text in the comments section.

Posted on 17 February 2026, 03:59 by: ravenlolanth

Blacked edits retards getting mad in the comments is fucking hilarious

Posted:	2025-11-30 03:37
Parent:	3660073
Visible:	Yes
Language:	English TR
File Size:	38.52 MiB
Length:	24 pages
Favorited:	216 times

language:	english translated
parody:	fate stay night
character:	rin tosaka
artist:	giga
female:	collar dark skin impregnation netorare sole female stockings
male:	big penis chastity belt humiliation
other:	redraw

Rating:		301
Average: 1.67

Tosaka BWC 2 [Blimberryjuice] (Fate/stay night)

遠坂凛 BBC寝取られ + 遠坂 BBC②