Someone explain to me why so many comics have covers that don't match their content. A cover has two purposes, to catch attention and to describe the contents. Covers that don't match automatically fail at the second but the first is the one that really confuses me.
A given cover strongly implies that you think people are interested in whatever you depict, you wouldn't use it otherwise. If you think people are interested in it enough to have it be the first thing they see then why wouldn't you include it in the comic? You clearly think its something people want.
@Wildinferno1368, imho the main and extra naming of magazine, the cover and the content are quite at place. Seems like each volume is focused on a single fetish(this one about sex toys) that saves people the time if they aren't interested in mixed anthologies or this exact kink, while the covers never guaranteed that the exact artist would be here with something about petplay or smth, unless cover artist is the one of authors below(and it can be found in a second on a cover). Even those who buy a physical copy or see previews on sites like DLsite before buying aren't duped, nor less us who are even less "scammed" as you're saying.