Don't forget to support the original and stuff.

http://www.dlsite.com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ201429.html
http://www.dmm.co.jp/dc/doujin/-/detail/=/cid=d_111437/

does anyone believe this? I didn't buy this. The fuckin only comment on the original that isn't someone bunging on more release info is someone saying "yay, now I don't have to buy this!"
Like, you should still totally do it though. Go legal. Be the good guy. Be a better guy than me. Be a better person than someone translating futa hentai at 10pm.

Damn, It was a trap

Base +6, Captian Katsura -7, NotThrustday +6, Novanity +7, Randomman24 +5, a84 +6

lol translating otokonoko to dickgirl

Base +6, SCSS +19, anon195 +7, Captian Katsura -7, deudly +6, lastcorn +6, shadowknight007 -6, NotThrustday +6, Novanity +7, UnknowDestroyer +19, Amy untold fan XXX +6, yoshi245 +7, azergth345 +6, and 3 more...

RAW: https://e-hentai.org/g/1073248/4725f3c4d5/

Base +47, Novanity +7

@ritsukai

yeah, it was a tough decision. As I said, she clearly has boobs, which traps don't have. And as for the "but the text says...!", the item's product page lists both futanari and trap as tags. It's difficult to do an english release of a CG set where the art and the writing contradict each other, even if on the face of it the translation looks quite simple

Base +7, 185484 +7, HeavHo +11, Novanity +7, Universal_Lover +6, SpigotTheBear +8, Iroald +6, ChaseRaph69 +5, noitem1 +6

@earlofstasis
It would be more precise to define the content as "traps with boobs" a.k.a shemale since the title boldly include otokonoko in it.
Also regarding tags on product page, it was never really accurate. Some who put it there might mix stuff between futanari and shemale, even they might don't bother to differ between them.

The content creator of this works seems boldly has fetish where the traps need to have boobs. I find it very hot and sexy though.

Base +8, Kokonoe Rin -6, Novanity +7, Seabook +6, Randomman24 +5, UnknowDestroyer +19, Universal_Lover +6, Amuro1X +7, Iroald +6, noitem1 +6