This is not a siterip. The main principle of the selection is color, nude & popular arts.
The purpose of creating my galleries is to enable for fans of furry content to download many good pictures at once without trash.
You can find the e621.net siterip until 2020 here - http://pornolab.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2604615
My galleries contain selected arts from posts of year 2020

Base +7, Alice S.H. -6, Seltzer -6, Brachi -4

It does, however, separate the images from the tagging that allows you to identify the artist if there is no signature, as well as any link to the original image, leaving you with just an anonymous hash code for a filename.

Base +7, Qwertius +10, popcorn71 +11, Alice S.H. +6, Seltzer +6, zackwolf -14

'from posts of year 2020' There are signatures with 2019 and earlier through out these galleries

Base +6, Seltzer +6, zackwolf -14, Brachi +4

I'm sorry, but that's essentially even worse than a siterip, since this is missing images on basically random criteria. It's also far to unsorted to be usefull for "downloading many good pictures [...] without trash".

This whole thing serves no purpose that can't be achieved by just going to e621.net or downloading the siterip.

Base +6, Seltzer +6, zackwolf -14, Brachi +4

It's not clear if "posts of year 2020" means art posted in 2020 by the artist, or art posted to e621.net in 2020, which could be quite different, since being posted to e621.net depends on someone finding the art elsewhere and deciding it should be posted, which can occur some time after the art is put up by the artist.

Base +7, Seltzer +6, zackwolf +14

Gonna post my comment from the others, since we're up to 38,000 "selected" images now.
This is a pretty random gallery. Not sure what the "selection" criteria were, based on the sheer size of this dump… If I want e621, I tend to just go there. It's also not sorted at all.

Basically, I don't really understand why you're uploading siterips, as much as I enjoy (some of) the pictures.
I know you claim that the shit art isn't here, which is mostly fair, but at the same time none of the images here are sorted and as a result it's still easier to use tag searching on e621 itself.
You've posted 38,000 images so far (about 9.5 GiB). Who's going to look through that without tags or even meaningful filenames/separation of themes?

Re: "If you personally don't like it, then walk by. Or just give a bad grade if it matters to you. But there is no need to tell me what to do." (from part 12)
Just giving suggestions on how to make your galleries better. I don't really understand how this is better than just ignoring the junk on e621 where things are at least tagged individually and can be filtered by artist or subject matter (and can appear in chronological order by upload time, which is convenient for sequences).
Also, you're literally telling me what to do.

When you've posted 38,000 images, it doesn't feel overly "selective." More like a HDD dump. Especially when all the filenames are just the hashes that the site uses, rather than anything descriptive.

"There are people who browse my galleries and add them to their favorites." (also from part 12)
Yes, and there are also people who favorite absolutely anything else one can think of. What's your point? Different people have different tastes, sure, but I'm certain a well sorted gallery would get more favorites than any of these "selected" galleries have. And higher ratings, to boot.

Base +20, Seltzer +6, zackwolf -14, Brachi +4