Oh boy, another "selected" gallery of unsorted, sourceless pictures using md5 checksums instead of descriptive filenames.

Also I find it hard to believe that 2000 "selected" images per gallery, and last year over 48,000 overall, have any sort of hard selection process.

Re-posting my comment from last time you did this:
----
This is a pretty random gallery. Not sure what the "selection" criteria were, based on the sheer size of this dump… If I want e621, I tend to just go there. It's also not sorted at all.

Basically, I don't really understand why you're uploading (incomplete) siterips, as much as I enjoy (some of) the pictures.
I know you claim that the shit art isn't here, which is mostly fair, but at the same time none of the images here are sorted and as a result it's still easier to use tag searching on e621 itself.
You've posted 50,000 images so far (about 15 GiB). Who's going to look through that without tags or even meaningful filenames/separation of themes?

Re: "If you personally don't like it, then walk by. Or just give a bad grade if it matters to you. But there is no need to tell me what to do." (from part 12 of the 2020 dump)
Just giving suggestions on how to make your galleries better. I don't really understand how this is better than just ignoring the junk on e621 where things are at least tagged individually and can be filtered by artist or subject matter (and can appear in chronological order by upload time, which is convenient for sequences).
Also, you're literally telling me what to do.

When you've posted 50,000 images, it doesn't feel overly "selective." More like a HDD dump. Especially when all the filenames are just the hashes that the site uses, rather than anything descriptive.

"There are people who browse my galleries and add them to their favorites." (also from part 12)
Yes, and there are also people who favorite absolutely anything else one can think of. Including CGC galleries with terrible watermarks. What's your point? Different people have different tastes, sure, but I'm certain a well sorted gallery would get more favorites than any of these "selected" galleries have. And higher ratings, to boot.

Last edited on 31 December 2021, 16:04.

Base +21, IttePerkele +6, dekamaster2 +7, eduimudzz +6, Tengerimal +6, Tavali +7, Hymne2 +6, hereIam -7, mjera +6, vikinng +6, wakabala +6

@dragontamer8740, You can duplicate your message at least a hundred times, but the fact is that I don't care about your opinion. This site hosts thousands of different personal galleries. Only you have targeted mine. I do not know why this is so, but I find it funny to see your useless stubbornness. Be healthy!

Base +7, eduimudzz -6, Tavali -7, SpicySpicyMamaMia -6, IttePerkele -6, Hymne2 -6, hereIam +7, mjera -6, vikinng -6, Tearlow -24, wakabala -6

Thousands "selected" images. As if.
It's just a random furry images dump from a booru, without any tags. dragontamer8740 is right.

Hell, there are even 24 parts (2000 images each one) of that mess! O my god.

Base +8, eduimudzz +6, IttePerkele +6, Hymne2 +6, vikinng +6, wakabala +6