https://www.patreon.com/frieddoughart
https://twitter.com/frieddoughart

Like I said on the last one, it's not even a gender change. It's a drawing of the artist himself and his real life boyfriend as Red & the Wolf. If anything, it's cosplay.

He's drawn these same "characters" numerous times outside of the Red Riding Hood style

Base +6, meefsss +6, HenoZak +6, Cat2323 +5, romanicyte +25, Waitugreat +32

Both Gender Change and Gender Morph include the line "For parodies (e.g. female ranma saotome) the change itself does not have to be shown." this would apply to Little Red Riding Hood because she is canon enough to have a character tag.

Whether Gender Change+Gender Morph should be here depends on the validity of Clockworks1441's claim that it is a drawing of the artist himself crossplaying the character. Crossplay does not invoke Gender Change+Gender Morph outside of the Cosplay category (which treats the cosplayer as the character itself, meaning the above rule for gender change/morph can apply to them).

Little Red Riding Hood is a bit of a conundrum for such claims because across different adaptions of the fairy tales there is a fairly coherent idea of what her outfit would look like but not the character itself, leaving a lot of room for artistic liberty on how she (and even more so a genderbend version) looks to blur the lines with cosplay. But "artist drew himself with his boyfriend" sounds verifiable and quickly skimming his twitter he does seem to use these same characters for other content.

I'd say Genderbend is incorrect for the reasons @Clockworks1441 gave, but absolutely not the bullshit "I'll refuse to read the tag descriptions but get really angry accusing other people of not reading them either" rant Pseudo-Nim keeps going on.

Last edited on 28 July 2022, 18:09.

Base +20, romanicyte +25, Waitugreat +32, Byza +13, somerandomdude33 +16

Damn. These comments show hentai is serious business. "You'll just have to fap AFTER the semantic argument." -Dr Coomer

Base +11, somerandomdude33 +16