https://twitter.com/Nicoffeeart
https://subscribestar.adult/nicoffee
https://nicoffee.itch.io
https://cohost.org/nicoffee
https://itaku.ee/profile/nicoffeee
https://nicoffee.newgrounds.com

Is there some particular reason that I am unaware of that causes 60% of Nicoffee's galleries to get 2-3 star ratings? Have they done something? Are they some reprehensible human? I can't divine a reason based on their art. Artists in the same niche, like Bikupan, have excellently rated galleries, so it can't just be the cum inflation/impregnation stuff. I can understand being turned off by stuff that is generally considered nasty, like gore or scat, and giving it a knee-jerk low rating, but that's clearly not the case given how comparatively tame Nicoffee's stuff is. Nicoffee releases reasonably lengthed sets, longer than the norm at least, and more often to boot. There is a slight trade-off in quality, accordingly, but it's still top-shelf stuff, some of the best in its genre in my personal opinion. But my opinion aside, the art is still above average. I'm just confused at the middling scores all the time and can't figure it out.

Last edited on 02 March 2024, 02:32.

Base +6, breederdude +1, Jago Smith +8, kurotaro +7, NomNom99 +11, DarkDragonOverlord +6, xknounx +7, KingOfHorsecocks1887 +6, Beans7897 -5