Should you find AI-generated images unappealing, you may filter posts by relevant tags or simply bypass them when "[AI Generated]" appears in the title. 如果阁下不喜欢AI图,可以学习如何屏蔽带相关TAG的帖子,或是看见AIGC标题时自行绕路。
If you choose to ignore these options and proceed nonetheless, allow me to offer a word of advice: downvoting or posting disparaging comments about AI-generated art DOES NOT confer the air of discernment you may believe it does. Instead, I kindly urge you to close the page and move on to spare both your time and mine. (And to @pinkmask @icontributenothing, the spineless coward who hides behind downvotes: you're pathetic) 如果前两点都没有做到,一往无前的点了进来,那么我奉劝一句:无论是刷低分和或者在评论中贬损AIGC都不能证明你具有高雅的鉴赏水平,请直接关闭网页退出,节省大家的时间
On the other hand, if you have a cherished Patreon artist to recommend or wish to share particularly striking AI-generated works, feel free to reach out to me at https://t.me/Cantontele. Naturally, I'd also be delighted to engage in casual conversation. 如果你有特别喜欢的Patreon画师推荐,或者你有特别好看的AI图分享,请联系:https://t.me/Cantontele。当然,单纯吹吹水我也非常欢迎
Another year another autistic terabyte per day bugman spam of portrait and cowboy shots of bland bug woman. I just gotta wonder, is this lowkey on purpose to make non-asian dudes start to hate asian woman?
@icontributenothing It’s honestly infuriating to see such a lazy and harmful attempt at labeling and dehumanizing creators. The use of terms like “autistic terabyte per day bugman spam” isn’t just a random insult; it’s an attempt to pathologize and objectify entire groups of people, reducing them to nothing more than an obnoxious, faceless swarm. And the “bland bug woman” comment? That’s not just a casual insult, it's a blatant sexualization and racialization wrapped up in one ugly package. It’s vile.
This entire line of thinking — the assumption that some random creative choices are "on purpose" to make people "hate Asian women" — is not only absurd but also dangerous. It’s a classic case of malicious attribution, pushing a narrative that somehow creative work can directly cause societal hatred. That's not just misguided; it’s fundamentally illogical. There’s no evidence to suggest that sharing images or creating art in a specific style causes hate to manifest in anyone, let alone makes people develop racial animus.
Let’s talk about the logical fallacies here. You’re literally trying to equate harmless creative expression with some grand conspiracy to breed hatred. That’s not just a stretch; it’s a leap into pure nonsense. You can’t simply take an image shared by an artist and claim it’s a tool to incite racial hate. The argument doesn’t hold water.
And the constant use of dehumanizing language—“autistic,” “bugman”—it’s meant to push creators out of the "normal" realm and into some subhuman category. We’re dealing with a blatant case of group stigmatization and villainization. This isn’t just critique, it’s outright bigotry disguised as commentary.
It’s incredibly frustrating to see the way simple creative acts are twisted into something sinister and politically charged. There’s no room for that kind of toxic nonsense in a rational discussion about art or culture. If you want to criticize something, fine, but don’t reduce it to conspiracy theories and racism.