https://www.patreon.com/user?u=37352505

Should you find AI-generated images unappealing, you may filter posts by relevant tags or simply bypass them when "[AI Generated]" appears in the title.
如果阁下不喜欢AI图，可以学习如何屏蔽带相关TAG的帖子，或是看见AIGC标题时自行绕路。

If you choose to ignore these options and proceed nonetheless, allow me to offer a word of advice: downvoting or posting disparaging comments about AI-generated art DOES NOT confer the air of discernment you may believe it does. Instead, I kindly urge you to close the page and move on to spare both your time and mine.
（And to @pinkmask @icontributenothing, the spineless coward who hides behind downvotes: you're pathetic）
如果前两点都没有做到，一往无前的点了进来，那么我奉劝一句：无论是刷低分和或者在评论中贬损AIGC都不能证明你具有高雅的鉴赏水平，请直接关闭网页退出，节省大家的时间

On the other hand, if you have a cherished Patreon artist to recommend or wish to share particularly striking AI-generated works, feel free to reach out to me at https://t.me/Cantontele. Naturally, I'd also be delighted to engage in casual conversation.
如果你有特别喜欢的Patreon画师推荐，或者你有特别好看的AI图分享，请联系：https://t.me/Cantontele。当然，单纯吹吹水我也非常欢迎

How do you not see the true irony of someone posting 500 pages of repetitive garbage and then asking everyone to "spare both your time and mine." Your verbal diarrhea is just like your art and will convince almost nobody that you are somehow an artist. If you really truly want to have any claim to being an artist, then what you DON'T post is more important what you do. Seriously. Have a vision, a purpose, something, anything that isn't 500 pages of beautiful woman one after another with the same cliched themes again and again. Its too much! Do something original, inventive, inspiring. The first plane flight was awe inspiring and worth 5 stars and more, now flying a plane is both boring and stupid, 1 star, no matter how much faster or how good the food is. See the connection? Open your eyes. Please. I love AI art and 3D images and beautiful women, this stuff here makes me die inside. Like Van Gogh painting a million white fences. Don't be like that!

Base +6, zoonke -6, Vaporlocke -7, PinkMask +10, henrykung1983 +12, gostart -4, grf9ypR2nswfHud7 +4, albertzeb +6, iamnuomi +6

These are some great pics.
The art would be easier to appreciate if the files were bigger.
Small files drop details and blur images.
If you are going for the big time you need big files.
This art deserves bigger files.

Base +6, PinkMask -10, albertzeb -6

It's annoying that these galleries are like mystery box. The cover doesn't reflect much of the content at all. How about put a preview of the gallery at the cover? Like several pictures in square grid?

Base +6, PinkMask -10, albertzeb -6

@Slentrific
Oh, so now you're the grand arbiter of what counts as "true art," huh? The sheer arrogance of waltzing in, dismissing an entire body of work as "repetitive garbage" while propping yourself up as some enlightened critic—without a single ounce of actual creative output to back it up—is honestly laughable. You reek of someone who's never produced anything substantial but thinks tearing others down makes up for that void.

Let's unpack this mess. First, your "verbal diarrhea" quip is nothing but a cheap, lazy insult—a transparent attempt to sidestep any real discussion. What, is your argument so fragile that you have to resort to name-calling instead of actual critique? Then there's your "makes me die inside" bit, a classic case of emotional manipulation, as if your personal suffering somehow validates your opinion as objective truth. Spare us the dramatics.

And oh, the Van Gogh appeal—how convenient! You sing his praises while completely missing the irony: the same "vision" you demand from others is exactly what made Van Gogh unappreciated in his time. You wield his name like a blunt weapon, but your own standards contradict everything he stood for. If quantity equals mediocrity, then by your logic, Van Gogh should've stopped painting after one masterpiece. But no, his legacy exists precisely because of his relentless output. So which is it? Do you actually understand artistic evolution, or do you just name-drop to sound cultured?

Your false dilemma is another joke. "Real artists should only post selectively"—according to whom? You? Who granted you the divine right to define what an artist should or shouldn't do? As if self-expression must fit into some imaginary rulebook you've conjured up. Your slippery slope argument—"500 pages = automatically trash"—assumes that repetition kills quality, when in reality, iteration is the lifeblood of refinement. Art isn't about arbitrary quotas; it's about exploration, mastery, and personal voice.

And let’s not ignore your manipulative closing: "Don't be like that!"—as if you're a benevolent mentor guiding a lost soul, when in reality, you're just another self-important critic shoving your narrow standards down someone else’s throat. You claim to "love AI art and 3D images and beautiful women," yet you rant like someone bitter that the art being created doesn’t cater to your personal taste. But art doesn't exist to please you.

So here's the deal: if you actually care about artistic integrity, start by making something yourself instead of hiding behind hollow rhetoric. Otherwise, you're just another loudmouth who mistakes condescension for insight.

Base +13, PinkMask -10, henrykung1983 -12, albertzeb -6, jlkgd0975 +6