What I really like about this doujin is that is packed with action from the beginning, no buildups.

Base +18, pyonushi +7, Nlkfma +13, dnomo +6, mysticmirror +6

Is there some new tagging policy I didn't hear about? I keep seeing obvious futa doujins tagged as shemale for no reason.

Base +6, wjcf129 +10, nameme +6, AstroLynx +6, mysticmirror +6, jessica702 +16, drlim81 +6, anonymousMember +6, qwerty5715 +6

@kageganon It's the oldest there is! No pussy = no futa. It's that easy! Always was, always will be.

Base +6, nameme -6, mysticmirror -6, jessica702 -16, bahki -7, ghoulatte -5

https://www.melonbooks.co.jp/detail/detail.php?product_id=2492683

Base +28, wjcf129 +10, nuts987 +15, mali888 +22

That rule shouldn't apply when the characters are female and you can't see if there's no vagina. Futanari's in the damn name of the doujin.

Base +6, mysticmirror +6, jessica702 +16

normally I would agree with you @kageganon but I have seen so many artists where they draw quote-unquote ""futonari"" but where you can never see them from behind or never see the vagina or anus like they just painted from an angle where you can't see if they have anything or not.

but then suddenly they will depict one where it is obvious in your face they have no vagina.

additionally some artists do take canonical female characters and then depict them without a vagina!💢 I have no idea why?

so yes... even though this the book is called "Ane NTR!! Futanari Barbara-chan" and yeah we don't see if they do have a vagina or not.

I prefer to avoid extend a rule to make sure for now on... only futonari is tagged "futonari" over all of these people just throwing shemale into the futonari tag even if yes the character canonically is female and you can't see if she do or don't have a vagina.

if it's not explicitly!!! shown in some form a character have both reproductive organs? it should not be tagged futonari.

Base +6